Layne Norton, PhD vs Sting — مقارنة حسابات إنستغرام

Doc Amen is Confused About Research Study Design Follow @biolayne for more NO BS info This clip is from @doctor.mike The Checkup podcast, a show I’ve been on, and one I respect because Mike actually asks the questions people avoid answering. In this interview, Doc Amen claims he’s done “more studies than anyone.” So Dr. Mike does what a good science communicator should do: ➡️ “Can you cite a randomized controlled trial?” ➡️ “Is there meta-analytic evidence?” And… he never answers. No citation. No trial. No meta-analysis. Instead, we get word salad, deflection, and confusion about why randomized controlled trials matter in the first place. RCTs aren’t a “nice to have.” They’re the minimum bar when you’re making clinical claims, especially claims tied to diagnostics, treatments, or interventions that people pay for. If someone says: “I have done studies,” but doesn’t cite a single study, that’s not evidence, that’s marketing. Credit where it’s due: Dr. Mike stays calm, presses respectfully, and exposes the gap without grandstanding. This is exactly how pseudoscience gets challenged — not by yelling, but by asking for receipts. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence End of story.