@human.error.study
Human.Error.Study
⚠️ CASE STUDY: HUMAN BEHAVIOR 📉 Science of bad decisions. 👁️ Observe. Learn. Survive. 📩 DM for Credit / Removal
@human.error.study Profile Analysis Summary
Based on the last 12 posts
When we look at how human.error.study's audience interacts with their content, we see an engagement rate of 3.82% — that's about 9.9K likes and 587 comments per post on average. Compared to similar accounts in the 100K-500K follower range (where the average sits around 1.8%), this is 112% higher, which suggests a genuinely engaged community.
Looking at content mix, about 100% of recent posts are videos and 0% are photos.
Key Metrics
273.2K
Followers
1
Following
12
Total Posts
3.82%
Engagement Rate
9.9K
Avg Likes
587
Avg Comments
Authority Score
Calculated from reach, engagement, content quality, and trust signals
Score Breakdown
273,240 followers
3.82% engagement rate
12 posts, 587 avg comments
273240.0:1 follower ratio
Building credibility
Authority Score is an estimated metric based on 12 recent posts and public profile data. It reflects potential influence and engagement quality.
Industry Benchmark
118.3K
Total Likes
7K
Total Comments
Engagement Rate
Your engagement rate is 112% above the Mid-tier (100K-500K) average. This indicates strong audience connection and content resonance.
Avg. Likes per Post
Your average likes are 23% above the Mid-tier (100K-500K) benchmark. Your content resonates well with your audience.
Avg. Comments per Post
Your comment rate exceeds the Mid-tier (100K-500K) average by 135%. You're building meaningful conversations with your audience.
Benchmarks are based on industry averages for accounts in similar follower tiers. Individual performance may vary based on niche, content type, and audience demographics.
Publishing Frequency
3.0
Posts per day
21
Posts per week
Saturday
Most active day
Posts by Weekday
Top Performing Content
ANALYSIS: When You Ask Not to Be Saved (And Regret It) ⚠️ Video Credit: @Scoopz / DM for Credit Cas...
View on Instagram
ANALYSIS: Static Load vs. The Oil Pan ⚠️ Video Credit: Viral / TikTok / DM for Credit Case File: 40...
View on Instagram
ANALYSIS: Gravity Check Failed ⚠️ Video Credit: Viral / @Trump_Mania / DM for Credit Case File: 0.3...
View on InstagramAnalyzed 12 posts. Top content receives 59K likes on average.
Content Type Analysis
Content Distribution
Videos
Photos
Videos outperform photos by 10.4K avg engagements per post.
Engagement Trend
Overall Trend
DecreasingComparing 6 older posts to 6 recent posts. Overall engagement has decreased by <span class="font-medium text-red-400">65.2</span>%
Likes Trend
-65.0%
Before: 14.6K avg
After: 5.1K avg
Comments Trend
-68.9%
Before: 896 avg
After: 278 avg
Total Engagement
-65.2%
Before: 15.5K avg
After: 5.4K avg
Caption Length Analysis
Caption Length Distribution
Average caption length: 1586 characters. Long captions (500+ chars) perform best with 10.4K avg engagements.
Hashtag Performance
With Hashtags
12
posts
Without Hashtags
0
posts
Most Used Hashtags
Average 5.0 hashtags per post. Posts with hashtags get 10.4K more avg engagements.
Growth Indicators
Account Classification
Medium InfluencerWith 273.2K followers, this account falls in the Medium category (50K-500K). Typical engagement for this tier: 1-3%
Following/Followers
0.000
ExcellentEngagement Rate
3.82%
Above averageTotal Followers
273.2K
Following 1- • Very influential - follows far fewer than followers
- • Engagement rate is above the 1-3% benchmark for medium accounts
- • Average of 9.9K likes and 587 comments per post
Hashtags & Captions
Top Hashtags
Based on 12 recent posts
Top Caption Words
Common words filtered out for relevance
Content Themes
Content Mood
The overall tone of this profile's content leans towards romantic & emotional with elements of neutral & informative.
Entertainment & Music
Entertainment, music, and nightlife content
Business & Motivation
Entrepreneurship and motivational content
Lifestyle & Fashion
Content about lifestyle, fashion, and personal style
Nature & Environment
Posts featuring natural landscapes and wildlife
Themes and mood are estimated by analyzing keywords in 12 public post captions and hashtags.
Audience Insights
Limited Data Available: Detailed audience demographics (country, age, gender) are only accessible to account owners through Instagram Insights. The data below is estimated from public content analysis.
Content Languages
Detected from 12 post captions
Audience Engagement
Based on likes-to-followers ratio
100K-1M followers
Estimated based on average engagement × 3
Audience Summary
This established account shows high engagement with primarily English content. Average post reaches an estimated 29.6K accounts.
Best Time to Post
Best performing time: Saturday 4pm
Posts during this time get highest average engagement
Based on engagement patterns from 12 posts with timestamps.
AI-Powered Analysis Summary
Key insights and performance highlights based on @human.error.study's recent content
@human.error.study's engagement rate of 3.82% is good compared to similar accounts. This indicates a good level of audience interaction and content effectiveness.
Content strategy is 100% focused on videos, which appears to be the strongest performing format for this profile.
Posting consistency is high with an average interval of 0 days between posts. high frequency typically leads to better audience retention.
Best performing video generated 6.0x more engagement than average posts, suggesting strong resonance with specific content themes.
Caption strategy follows a detailed approach with an average of 1586 characters. This detailed style aligns well with audience expectations for this account type.
This analysis is generated from publicly available data and provides estimated insights. Actual performance metrics may vary.
Explore Similar Public Profiles
Important Notice
All insights shown here are estimated using publicly available data. This tool is not affiliated with Instagram or Meta and does not access private information. Analytics are provided for informational purposes only and may not reflect actual account performance.