
207.2K
FIThe U.S. Supreme Court has not issued a blanket ruling declaring all Trump tariffs illegal, but it has signaled that presidential tariff powers are limited by law and cannot be used without statutory authority or beyond the scope approved by Congress. In response,
Donald Trump has proposed imposing a 10% global tariff under Section 122 emergency powers while keeping existing Section 232 (national security) and Section 301 (trade enforcement) tariffs fully in place.
The legal tension is that Section 122 is designed for temporary emergency trade measures, so any broad or long-term universal tariff could face court challenges if it exceeds those limits. In short, the Court emphasizes legal boundaries on executive trade powers,
while Trump is pushing to expand tariffs using the strongest authority he believes the law allows.
@financebyankita







![#Statutory Reel by @tuhinz.h - Statutory warning - this aint educational content
[why not do an mba, tier 1 Bschool, ISB, XLRI]
#explorepage #mba #mbaindianstudents #besties #fyp](https://image.pictame.com/img/621619995_18339410896208287_5064996720467419594_n.jpg?hash=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)


