2.6K
MA🔍 Publication Ethics: What Keeps Science Trustworthy and How Malque Implements Them
Imagine a journal that publishes unverified data, ignores conflicts of interest, or turns a blind eye to plagiarism. The result? Retractions, wasted resources, and loss of credibility.
At Malque Publishing, publication ethics is not optional — it’s the foundation that keeps the scientific record reliable and useful. Our policies include:
✅ Double-blind peer review – authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
✅ Content integrity – zero tolerance for plagiarism, data fabrication, and image manipulation.
✅ Mandatory ethics approval – for research involving humans and animals.
✅ Transparency – disclosure of conflicts of interest and funders’ roles.
✅ Responsible authorship – in line with international criteria.
✅ Clear corrections and retractions – signaled via CrossMark.
When publishing with us, authors, reviewers, and editors work under explicit rules, auditable processes, and a commitment to internationally recognized best practices. This protects science — and those who depend on it.
Learn more in our blog [Link in Bio]
#Malque #MalquePublishing #OpenAccess #ScientificJournal #PublicationEthics #ResearchIntegrity #PeerReview #ScienceTrust #teamGD
@malquepub
