Bahaa Al Shari vs Physics Stuff — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Bahaa Al Shari and Physics Stuff Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @0bsh (Bahaa Al Shari) and @physics.stuff (Physics Stuff). With 896K and 895.8K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

🇯🇴♑ 25 Dec ~# 𝙲𝙴𝙷 👨‍💻 ~# ᴄʏʙᴇʀꜱᴇᴄᴜʀɪᴛʏ | 𝙴𝚇 🛡️ - مُعقد لا احد يجيد فهم رغباتي.

896K

Followers

50%

1.6K

Following

24

Posts

2%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

Physics, Science, Politics. Justice, integrity, free thought, speech & critical thinking. * Not affiliated with any public figure or organization

895.8K

Followers

50%

15

Following

1.5K

Posts

98%

ComparisonLeading

In this overview, @0bsh is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.

Top Performing Posts

Top post by @0bsh

وكم من الضياع يلزمنا يا تُرى لكي نجد أنفسنا؟.

@0bsh
13.8K
0
Winner
Top post by @physics.stuff

The phenomenon observed here involves both additive and subtractive color mixing. When red, green, and blue lights combine, they form white light through additive mixing. However, when a slit blocks portions of this white light, subtractive color mixing occurs. The slit acts as a filter, allowing specific wavelengths of light to pass through. As a result, shadows cast by objects appear in cyan, magenta, and yellow. These shadows arise because each primary color in the additive model corresponds to a complementary color in the subtractive model: cyan complements red, magenta complements green, and yellow complements blue. 🎥: @art.pete.repeat #physicsclass #physicsfacts #physicslovers #physicslover #physicsfun #physicsstudent #physicsfact #physicsfacts #theoryofeverything #theoryofrelativity #stringtheory #understandlife #understandinglife #quantumtheory #quantummechanics #quantumfield #astronomyfacts #astrofacts #spacefacts #spacetheory

@physics.stuff
1.3M
1.9K
13.8K likesVS1.3M likes 🏆

@physics.stuff's best post achieved 1.3M likes, which is 1.3M more than @0bsh's top post at 13.8K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@0bsh(2 wins)
VS
(4 wins)@physics.stuff
896K
Followers
895.8K
1.6K
Following
99% ahead
15
24
Total Posts
98% ahead
1.5K
0.39%
Engagement Rate
97% ahead
12.75%
3.5K
Avg Likes
97% ahead
114K
0
Avg Comments
100% ahead
283
0bsh2 - 4🏆 physics.stuff

In this head-to-head comparison, @physics.stuff wins 4 out of 6 categories while @0bsh takes 2. @physics.stuff leads overall, but @0bsh shows notable strength in Followers.

The most significant gap appears in Avg Comments, where @physics.stuff leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

@0bsh

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help
Better Strategy
@physics.stuff

3

With Hashtags

9

Without Hashtags

Avg per post2.3
Avg Likes439.1K
Avg Comments787
Hashtags boost engagement
#starship#spacex#physicsfacts#tesla#elonmusk

@physics.stuff uses an average of 2.3 hashtags per post, while @0bsh does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @physics.stuff.

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@0bsh
Growing

+80.5%

Engagement change

+81%

Likes

+0%

Comments

Older posts avg2.5K
Recent posts avg4.5K
@physics.stuff
Declining

-97.0%

Engagement change

-97%

Likes

-71%

Comments

Older posts avg221.8K
Recent posts avg6.8K

@0bsh shows a positive 80.5% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

@physics.stuff shows a significant -97.0% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.

Overall, @0bsh demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@0bsh

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Friday
Consistency15%

@physics.stuff

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Thursday
Consistency13%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @0bsh achieves a higher consistency score of 15%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

@0bsh is most active on Friday, while @physics.stuff prefers Thursday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
47
Established
@0bsh
Reach20/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency4/15
Verification0/10
Authority Score
Winner
85
Elite
@physics.stuff
Reach20/25
Engagement30/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Large

896K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@0bsh

Large

895.8K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@physics.stuff

Influence Index
47
/ 100
@0bsh
Influence Index
Winner
75
/ 100
@physics.stuff

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@0bsh

0.39%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@physics.stuff

12.75%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Excellent

Following/Followers Ratio

@0bsh

0.0018

Very influential

Excellent

@physics.stuff

1:59.7K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@0bsh

0.03

Low

@physics.stuff

1.69

Active

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @physics.stuff emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @0bsh's 1.


@0bsh

@0bsh excels in: Followers.

Followers

@physics.stuff

@physics.stuff excels in: Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 12.75% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.

Engagement RatePostsAvg LikesAvg Comments

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @0bsh has the larger audience (896K followers), @physics.stuff generates deeper engagement per post (12.75%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @0bsh

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @0bsh vs @physics.stuff

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, 0bsh leads the follower count with a difference of 140 followers. Specifically, @0bsh has 895,966 followers while @physics.stuff has 895,826 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @0bsh vs @physics.stuff

0bsh vs physics.stuff0bsh vs physics.stuff instagram0bsh physics.stuff comparisoncompare 0bsh physics.stuff0bsh versus physics.stuff0bsh vs physics.stuff followers0bsh vs physics.stuff engagement0bsh physics.stuff instagram stats