Cheick Diallo vs Ulm — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Cheick Diallo and Ulm Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @_cd13 (Cheick Diallo) and @j._cube (Ulm). With 56.1K and 11.4K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Medium and Medium level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
#TogetherWeCanChageTheWorld DONATE HERE ⬇️⬇️⬇️
56.1K
Followers
83%
417
Following
12
Posts
75%
In this overview, @_cd13 is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
｜𝗟𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗗𝗦𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 桃園台啤永豐雲豹近年來不僅在球場上力拚佳績，更致力於將正向影響力延伸至社會角落! 本季例行賽主場最終戰4月26日賽後，球團將攜手陣中洋將迪亞洛（Cheick Diallo）個人創辦的基金會「CD13 Foundation」，共同舉辦公益籃球活動，為號召球迷共襄盛舉！邀請雲豹球迷將對籃球的熱愛，化為幫助非洲孩童勇敢築夢的實際行動。 來自非洲馬利共和國的迪亞洛，一直以來心繫家鄉孩子的教育與發展，談及創辦基金會的初衷，迪亞洛感性分享：「我從小在資源比較匱乏的環境下生活，後來有機會到美國讀書、打球，就一直希望能回饋家鄉，成立基金會主要是為了幫助當地的兒童、病人與單親家庭，我期望透過籃球這個平台擴大影響力，讓下一代的孩子能在更好的環境下長大。」 —————— 🎫CD13 基金會.公益籃球套票(限量100套，售完為止） 🔹開賣時間｜2026/04/13（一）中午12:00 🔹購買平台｜KKTIX購票平台 🔹售價｜$1000 NTD 🙌活動所有收益在扣除必要成本後，將全數捐贈予「CD13 Foundation」，用於改善非洲孩童的生活與籃球資源。 🔹套票內容｜ 04/26（日）調啤區門票*2張 活動聯名Tee*乙件 賽後公益籃球活動參加資格*乙名 🔹 賽後公益籃球活動 時間｜17:30-19:30（視當天賽事結束時間彈性調整） 活動地點｜桃園巨蛋 活動內容｜台啤永豐雲豹球員及教練與參與者進行籃球互動 ⚠️注意事項 —比賽開打日3天前（不含開打日）受理因個人因素退票（酌收10%票價手續費），逾期不受理。 —賽事趨於激烈，如無法遵守球場觀賽規範者、或對球員女孩造成安全隱憂者，球團有權取消其入場權益。 —購票前請務必審閱KKTIX活動頁面上之運動賽事票券定型化契約。 —其他未盡事宜及各場次相關票務活動以台啤永豐雲豹職業籃球隊社群平台公告為主，且保有售票方式、售票區域及活動解釋變更及增列相關條文等權利。
@j._cube's best post achieved 2.2K likes, which is 1.6K more than @_cd13's top post at 576 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @j._cube leads by 98%.
Hashtag Performance
11
With Hashtags
1
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
3
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @_cd13 uses an average of 1.9 hashtags per post compared to @j._cube's 0.3.
@_cd13 has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
+465.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
+145.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@_cd13 shows a positive 465.1% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@j._cube shows a positive 145.5% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
Overall, @_cd13 demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@_cd13
@j._cube
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 4.0 times per week respectively. @j._cube achieves a higher consistency score of 87%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @j._cube follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@_cd13 is most active on Sunday, while @j._cube prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
56.1K followers
Range: 50K-500K
@_cd13
11.4K followers
Range: 10K-50K
@j._cube
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@_cd13
0.21%
Benchmark: 1-3%
@j._cube
12.48%
Benchmark: 3-5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@_cd13
0.0074
Very influential
@j._cube
0.0069
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@_cd13
0.21
Moderate@j._cube
0.35
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @j._cube emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @_cd13's 2.
@_cd13
@_cd13 excels in: Followers, Posts.
@j._cube
@j._cube excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 12.48% (benchmark for this size: 3-5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @_cd13 has the larger audience (56.1K followers), @j._cube generates deeper engagement per post (12.48%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @_cd13
FAQ About @_cd13 vs @j._cube
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us