ABSTRACT MAG vs Animals Doing Things — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare ABSTRACT MAG and Animals Doing Things Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @abstract.mag (ABSTRACT MAG) and @animalsdoingthings (Animals Doing Things). With 1.1M and 5.6M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Online platform specializes in abstract art.
1.1M
Followers
17%
424
Following
12
Posts
50%
Rated the #1 Instagram page by every single animal Tap to shop our merch! ⬇️
5.6M
Followers
83%
152
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
@animalsdoingthings's best post achieved 57.5K likes, which is 39.5K more than @abstract.mag's top post at 18K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @animalsdoingthings wins 3 out of 6 categories while @abstract.mag takes 2. @animalsdoingthings leads overall, but @abstract.mag shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Followers, where @animalsdoingthings leads by 80%.
Hashtag Performance
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
6
With Hashtags
6
Without Hashtags
@animalsdoingthings uses an average of 0.5 hashtags per post, while @abstract.mag does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @animalsdoingthings.
Engagement Trend
-26.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-46.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@abstract.mag shows a moderate -26.0% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@animalsdoingthings shows a moderate -46.4% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
Overall, @abstract.mag demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@abstract.mag
@animalsdoingthings
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @animalsdoingthings achieves a higher consistency score of 66%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @animalsdoingthings follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@abstract.mag is most active on Monday, while @animalsdoingthings prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@abstract.mag
5.6M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@animalsdoingthings
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@abstract.mag
0.32%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@animalsdoingthings
0.31%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@abstract.mag
1:2.7K
Very influential
@animalsdoingthings
1:37.1K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@abstract.mag
0.01
Low@animalsdoingthings
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @animalsdoingthings emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @abstract.mag's 1.
@abstract.mag
@abstract.mag excels in: Engagement Rate.
With an engagement rate of 0.32% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
@animalsdoingthings
@animalsdoingthings excels in: Followers, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @animalsdoingthings has the larger audience (5.6M followers), @abstract.mag generates deeper engagement per post (0.32%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @abstract.mag
FAQ About @abstract.mag vs @animalsdoingthings
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us