Mallory Austin | Food Blogger vs Mujahid Khan — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Mallory Austin | Food Blogger and Mujahid Khan Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @badbatchbaking (Mallory Austin | Food Blogger) and @science__pulse (Mujahid Khan). With 1.1M and 1.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
🍟 Comfort foods & desserts ✝️ Matthew 16:25 📍ATL 💌badbatchbaking@gmail.com 👇BIO LINKS FOR RECIPES👇 | Tag #badbatchbaking
1.1M
Followers
50%
1.1K
Following
1.1K
Posts
86%
DM for Paid Collaborations & Brand Work Shop my picks: 👇
1.1M
Followers
50%
13
Following
172
Posts
14%
In this overview, @badbatchbaking is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
It’s taken a year. And this was still near impossible to make. @goldenphases gave us with the most thoughtful gift that grieving parents could have received. Not to mention, she wouldn’t take a dime from me. What an incredible feeling to be loved and understood by someone you don’t know and have never met before. She’s not only an incredible artist but a beautiful soul. Her kindness is the only reason I was able to fulfill making this video because I would’ve never told this story otherwise. But she deserves all my praise for this beautiful gift 🙏 #loss #grief #childloss
@badbatchbaking's best post achieved 120.1K likes, which is 107.9K more than @science__pulse's top post at 12.2K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @badbatchbaking wins 6 out of 6 categories while @science__pulse takes 0. @badbatchbaking leads overall, but @science__pulse shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Following, where @badbatchbaking leads by 99%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@badbatchbaking uses an average of 4.1 hashtags per post, while @science__pulse does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @badbatchbaking.
Engagement Trend
-60.6%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
+1166.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@badbatchbaking shows a significant -60.6% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@science__pulse shows a positive 1166.4% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
Overall, @science__pulse demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@badbatchbaking
@science__pulse
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @science__pulse achieves a higher consistency score of 32%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @science__pulse follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@badbatchbaking is most active on Sunday, while @science__pulse prefers Tuesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@badbatchbaking
1.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@science__pulse
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@badbatchbaking
2.40%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@science__pulse
0.14%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@badbatchbaking
1:1K
Very influential
@science__pulse
1:87.3K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@badbatchbaking
0.93
Moderate@science__pulse
0.15
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @badbatchbaking emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 5 metric wins compared to @science__pulse's 0.
@badbatchbaking
@badbatchbaking excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 2.40% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
@science__pulse
No leading metrics in this comparison
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @badbatchbaking has the larger audience (1.1M followers), @badbatchbaking generates deeper engagement per post (2.40%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @badbatchbaking
FAQ About @badbatchbaking vs @science__pulse
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us