Rebecca vs Ankit Dungawat — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Rebecca and Ankit Dungawat Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @beccaxbloom (Rebecca) and @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat). With 3.4M and 674.5K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
674.5K
Followers
17%
2.2K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Stop searching random icons on Google — use one powerful library instead.✅ 6000+ free open-source icons you can customize, download, or use directly in code 🚀💻 👉 Comment “ICONS” and I’ll send you the link. tabler icons, free icon library, svg icons free, developer icon resources, ui icons for web, open source icons, react icons library #UIUX#WebDevelopment#FrontendDeveloper#DesignResources#DeveloperTools
@beccaxbloom's best post achieved 290.6K likes, which is 290.6K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @beccaxbloom wins 4 out of 6 categories while @codewith_random takes 1. @beccaxbloom leads overall, but @codewith_random shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @beccaxbloom leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @beccaxbloom uses an average of 0.3 hashtags per post compared to @codewith_random's 5.0.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
+42.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-23.9%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@beccaxbloom shows a positive 42.0% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@codewith_random shows a moderate -23.9% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
Overall, @beccaxbloom demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@beccaxbloom
@codewith_random
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @beccaxbloom achieves a higher consistency score of 21%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@beccaxbloom is most active on Sunday, while @codewith_random prefers Tuesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
3.4M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@beccaxbloom
674.5K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@beccaxbloom
4.60%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@codewith_random
0.06%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@beccaxbloom
1:3.2K
Very influential
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@beccaxbloom
0.00
Low@codewith_random
0.02
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @beccaxbloom emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @codewith_random's 0.
@beccaxbloom
@beccaxbloom excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 4.60% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
@codewith_random
No leading metrics in this comparison
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @beccaxbloom has the larger audience (3.4M followers), @beccaxbloom generates deeper engagement per post (4.60%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @beccaxbloom
FAQ About @beccaxbloom vs @codewith_random
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us