Bodybuilding.com vs TIME — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Bodybuilding.com and TIME Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @bodybuildingcom (Bodybuilding.com) and @time (TIME). With 2.7M and 12.7M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Celebrity level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Building Better Bodies Since 1999 Introducing new products at bbhealthplus.com including metabolism, longevity and personal health support!
2.7M
Followers
17%
126
Following
12
Posts
50%
News and current events from around the globe. Since 1923.
12.7M
Followers
83%
280
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @time is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Few writers are as candid about their influences as @lenadunham. In the wake of the release of her new memoir ‘Famesick,’ we asked the author and ‘Girls’ creator which books have shaped her, and what she thinks every woman should be reading right now. Who should we interview next for our book recommendation series? Tag them below. Location📍@192books Host: @lucyfeld Producer: @alenkacc
@time's best post achieved 53.8K likes, which is 53.2K more than @bodybuildingcom's top post at 562 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @time wins 5 out of 6 categories while @bodybuildingcom takes 0. @time leads overall, but @bodybuildingcom shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @time leads by 99%.
Hashtag Performance
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@bodybuildingcom uses an average of 0.8 hashtags per post, while @time does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @bodybuildingcom.
Engagement Trend
+46.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-50.3%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@bodybuildingcom shows a positive 46.2% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@time shows a significant -50.3% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @bodybuildingcom demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@bodybuildingcom
@time
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @bodybuildingcom achieves a higher consistency score of 60%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @bodybuildingcom follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
2.7M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@bodybuildingcom
12.7M followers
Range: 10M+
@time
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@bodybuildingcom
0.00%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@time
0.10%
Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%
Following/Followers Ratio
@bodybuildingcom
1:21.3K
Very influential
@time
1:45.5K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@bodybuildingcom
0.00
Low@time
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @time emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @bodybuildingcom's 0.
@bodybuildingcom
No leading metrics in this comparison
@time
@time excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.10% (benchmark for this size: 0.1-0.2%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @time has the larger audience (12.7M followers), @time generates deeper engagement per post (0.10%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @bodybuildingcom
FAQ About @bodybuildingcom vs @time
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us