Country Music Association vs GQ — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Country Music Association and GQ Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @cma (Country Music Association) and @gq (GQ). With 1.4M and 7.2M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Official Instagram of the Country Music Association. Membership org, home to CMA Awards, CMA Fest presented by SoFi, CMA Christmas and @CMAfoundation
1.4M
Followers
17%
1K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Big fits start here. @gqsports @gqrecommends @gqbox
7.2M
Followers
83%
987
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Shawn Carter is a lot of things to a lot of people: an artist, a tastemaker, a hustler, a hip-hop elder statesman, a fashion icon, a father, and one half of the world’s ultimate power couple. How has he managed to navigate (and dominate) all the different worlds through which he moves? As he told @willwelch several years ago, it’s simple: “I walk into every room as myself.” For GQ’s April issue, we examine the many facets of Jay-Z, and the 30 years of his nearly incalculable impact on culture since Reasonable Doubt. Jay sat down with @the_summerman for his first interview in years, on camera. That story, available in both written and video formats, is accompanied by photographs shot by visual artist Rashid Johnson, now primarily known as a New York–based painter and multimedia installation artist, but long admired by GQ for his early photo work in his hometown of Chicago. Watch (or read!) the interview at the link in bio. Interview by @the_summerman Photographs by @rashidjohnson Styled by @mobolajidawodu and @juneambrose Skin by @heeezooo using Sauvage Serum Hair by @nakiarachon Set design by @heathmattioli Tailoring by Yelena Travkina Produced by @campproductions
@gq's best post achieved 105.5K likes, which is 100.5K more than @cma's top post at 5K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @gq wins 4 out of 6 categories while @cma takes 1. @gq leads overall, but @cma shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @gq leads by 94%.
Hashtag Performance
6
With Hashtags
6
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @cma uses an average of 0.7 hashtags per post compared to @gq's 0.1.
@cma has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-78.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-89.3%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@cma shows a significant -78.1% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@gq shows a significant -89.3% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @cma demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@cma
@gq
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @cma achieves a higher consistency score of 12%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@cma is most active on Wednesday, while @gq prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.4M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@cma
7.2M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@gq
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@cma
0.08%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@gq
0.25%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@cma
1:1.4K
Very influential
@gq
1:7.3K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@cma
0.01
Low@gq
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @gq emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @cma's 0.
@cma
No leading metrics in this comparison
@gq
@gq excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.25% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @gq has the larger audience (7.2M followers), @gq generates deeper engagement per post (0.25%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @cma
FAQ About @cma vs @gq
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us