Ankit Dungawat vs LEVELS — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and LEVELS Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @eatlevels (LEVELS). With 665.4K and 664.3K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
665.4K
Followers
50%
2.2K
Following
1.9K
Posts
94%
Fastest growing chip brand in the world🌎 Cooked in 100% Avocado Oil 🥑 by @brentrivera
664.3K
Followers
50%
95
Following
113
Posts
6%
In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Sketch → real UI in seconds 🤯 I had a basic idea for a sneaker website… nothing polished, just a rough sketch. Instead of designing it manually, I tested the new Uni-1 model from Luma. And this is where it gets interesting — it didn’t just generate a random design… it actually understood the structure behind what I was trying to build. Everything from layout to sections feels intentional. This feels less like prompting… and more like working with something that actually gets your idea. Compared to GPT Image 1.5 / NB Pro, this feels way more structured and usable. Generated with Luma Uni-1 🚀 And honestly… this is just 1% of what it can do. Comment “TRY” and I’ll send you the link in DM 🔥 @lumalabsai #lumaai #uni1 #aitools #generativeai #aiimages
@eatlevels's best post achieved 66.8K likes, which is 66.9K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @eatlevels leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
11
With Hashtags
1
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@codewith_random uses an average of 4.5 hashtags per post, while @eatlevels does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @codewith_random.
Engagement Trend
-39.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
+124.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random shows a moderate -39.0% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@eatlevels shows a positive 124.2% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
Overall, @eatlevels demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@eatlevels
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @eatlevels achieves a higher consistency score of 55%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @eatlevels follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@codewith_random is most active on Saturday, while @eatlevels prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
665.4K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
664.3K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@eatlevels
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@eatlevels
3.09%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@eatlevels
1:7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
2.92
Active@eatlevels
0.17
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @eatlevels emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @codewith_random's 2.
@codewith_random
@codewith_random excels in: Followers, Posts.
@eatlevels
@eatlevels excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 3.09% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @codewith_random has the larger audience (665.4K followers), @eatlevels generates deeper engagement per post (3.09%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @eatlevels
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us