Ankit Dungawat vs Marcella | Lettering Artist — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and Marcella | Lettering Artist Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @lovableletters (Marcella | Lettering Artist). With 668.7K and 667.9K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
668.7K
Followers
50%
2.2K
Following
1.9K
Posts
75%
Helping you learn hand lettering + modern calligraphy w/ beginner-friendly tutorials, tips, + resources ↓ Lettering worksheets + bundles
667.9K
Followers
50%
369
Following
643
Posts
25%
In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Sketch → real UI in seconds 🤯 I had a basic idea for a sneaker website… nothing polished, just a rough sketch. Instead of designing it manually, I tested the new Uni-1 model from Luma. And this is where it gets interesting — it didn’t just generate a random design… it actually understood the structure behind what I was trying to build. Everything from layout to sections feels intentional. This feels less like prompting… and more like working with something that actually gets your idea. Compared to GPT Image 1.5 / NB Pro, this feels way more structured and usable. Generated with Luma Uni-1 🚀 And honestly… this is just 1% of what it can do. Comment “TRY” and I’ll send you the link in DM 🔥 @lumalabsai #lumaai #uni1 #aitools #generativeai #aiimages
Learning modern calligraphy on a budget? This is one of my favorite beginner-friendly options. If you’re just starting out with modern calligraphy and don’t want to splurge on supplies right away, Crayola markers are a great way to begin. They’re known for being an easy-to-find, affordable option, and something that many aspiring letterers already have at home. Crayola Broad Line and Super Tip markers both work well for practicing everything from the basic strokes to full words and phrases. They’re firmer than most brush pens, which makes them easier to control while you’re getting used to the basic motions of lettering and are overall a great stepping stone before buying more specialized brush pens. For this video, I used a Crayola Broad Line marker on my Simple Script Worksheet. This worksheet is unique within my collection because it’s designed with a monoline style. That means you don’t have to worry about adjusting your pressure to create thick and thin lines within the letters, making it perfect for beginners or anyone who prefers monoline lettering styles. That said, these markers can also be used for more than just monoline letters because they’re still flexible enough to respond to pressure, making them a great way to experiment with both styles as you’re learning. Looking for the worksheet in this video? Comment “SCRIPT” and I’ll send the link! 💕 Marker: Crayola Broad Line Marker (Battery Charged Blue) Nails: Olive & June Tab Press-Ons (Taffy) Paper: Astrobrights 28lb Printer Paper #handlettering #moderncalligraphy #learnlettering
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @codewith_random wins 5 out of 6 categories while @lovableletters takes 0. @codewith_random leads overall, but @lovableletters shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Following, where @codewith_random leads by 83%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 4.9 hashtags per post compared to @lovableletters's 4.6.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
+123.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-78.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random shows a positive 123.2% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@lovableletters shows a significant -78.2% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@lovableletters
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @lovableletters achieves a higher consistency score of 37%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@codewith_random is most active on Saturday, while @lovableletters prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
668.7K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
667.9K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@lovableletters
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.07%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@lovableletters
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@lovableletters
1:1.8K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
2.91
Active@lovableletters
0.96
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @codewith_random emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @lovableletters's 0.
@codewith_random
@codewith_random excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.07% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
@lovableletters
No leading metrics in this comparison
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @codewith_random has the larger audience (668.7K followers), @codewith_random generates deeper engagement per post (0.07%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @lovableletters
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us