Ankit Dungawat vs NCAA Women's Volleyball — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and NCAA Women's Volleyball Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @ncaavolleyball (NCAA Women's Volleyball). With 674.5K and 664.7K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
674.5K
Followers
50%
2.2K
Following
12
Posts
50%
The official account of NCAA DI Women’s and Beach Volleyball. Join us with #NCAAWVB and #NCAABeachVB
664.7K
Followers
50%
831
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Stop searching random icons on Google — use one powerful library instead.✅ 6000+ free open-source icons you can customize, download, or use directly in code 🚀💻 👉 Comment “ICONS” and I’ll send you the link. tabler icons, free icon library, svg icons free, developer icon resources, ui icons for web, open source icons, react icons library #UIUX#WebDevelopment#FrontendDeveloper#DesignResources#DeveloperTools
@ncaavolleyball's best post achieved 21.3K likes, which is 21.3K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @codewith_random wins 3 out of 6 categories while @ncaavolleyball takes 2. @codewith_random leads overall, but @ncaavolleyball shows notable strength in Engagement Rate.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @ncaavolleyball leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post compared to @ncaavolleyball's 1.1.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-31.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-61.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random shows a moderate -31.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@ncaavolleyball shows a significant -61.1% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@ncaavolleyball
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @ncaavolleyball achieves a higher consistency score of 24%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@codewith_random is most active on Tuesday, while @ncaavolleyball prefers Sunday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
674.5K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
664.7K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@ncaavolleyball
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@ncaavolleyball
1.04%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@ncaavolleyball
0.0013
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
0.02
Low@ncaavolleyball
0.02
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
Both profiles share similar strengths, making the competition between them quite balanced.
@codewith_random
@codewith_random excels in: Followers, Avg Comments.
@ncaavolleyball
@ncaavolleyball excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes.
With an engagement rate of 1.04% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @codewith_random has the larger audience (674.5K followers), @ncaavolleyball generates deeper engagement per post (1.04%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @ncaavolleyball
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us