Ankit Dungawat vs Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Ankit Dungawat and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @tmnt (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles). With 666.1K and 666.1K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑‍🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com

666.1K

Followers

50%

2.2K

Following

1.9K

Posts

45%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

Your one-stop pizza shop for all things cowabunga #TMNT Official 🐢🐢🐢🐢 Watch on @Nickelodeon & @ParamountPlus

666.1K

Followers

50%

56

Following

2.4K

Posts

55%

ComparisonLeading

In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.

Top Performing Posts

Top post by @codewith_random

Sketch → real UI in seconds 🤯 I had a basic idea for a sneaker website… nothing polished, just a rough sketch. Instead of designing it manually, I tested the new Uni-1 model from Luma. And this is where it gets interesting — it didn’t just generate a random design… it actually understood the structure behind what I was trying to build. Everything from layout to sections feels intentional. This feels less like prompting… and more like working with something that actually gets your idea. Compared to GPT Image 1.5 / NB Pro, this feels way more structured and usable. Generated with Luma Uni-1 🚀 And honestly… this is just 1% of what it can do. Comment “TRY” and I’ll send you the link in DM 🔥 @lumalabsai #lumaai #uni1 #aitools #generativeai #aiimages

@codewith_random
-1
28
Winner
Top post by @tmnt

past ⏩ present ⏩ Turtle Power 🐢 the World of TMNT is all. things. Turtles.

@tmnt
14.7K
245
-1 likesVS14.7K likes 🏆

@tmnt's best post achieved 14.7K likes, which is 14.7K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@codewith_random(3 wins)
VS
(3 wins)@tmnt
666.1K
Followers
666.1K
2.2K
Following
97% ahead
56
1.9K
Total Posts
19% ahead
2.4K
0.06%
Engagement Rate
95% ahead
1.30%
-1
Avg Likes
100% ahead
8.5K
395
Avg Comments
74% ahead
103
codewith_random3 - 3tmnt

In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.

The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @tmnt leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

Better Strategy
@codewith_random

12

With Hashtags

0

Without Hashtags

Avg per post4.9
Avg Likes-1
Avg Comments395
Hashtags boost engagement
#javascript#webdevelopment#aitools#programming#learntocode
@tmnt

1

With Hashtags

11

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.1
Avg Likes13.9K
Avg Comments300
Hashtags boost engagement
#tottmnt

Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 4.9 hashtags per post compared to @tmnt's 0.1.

@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy

Engagement Trend

@codewith_random
Declining

-49.2%

Engagement change

+0%

Likes

-49%

Comments

Older posts avg522
Recent posts avg265
Better Trend
@tmnt
Declining

-38.1%

Engagement change

-38%

Likes

-62%

Comments

Older posts avg10.7K
Recent posts avg6.6K

@codewith_random shows a moderate -49.2% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

@tmnt shows a moderate -38.1% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

Overall, @tmnt demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@codewith_random

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Saturday
Consistency14%

@tmnt

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency5%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @codewith_random achieves a higher consistency score of 14%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

@codewith_random is most active on Saturday, while @tmnt prefers Tuesday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
65
Expert
@codewith_random
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
75
Expert
@tmnt
Reach20/25
Engagement10/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Large

666.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@codewith_random

Large

666.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@tmnt

Influence Index
60
/ 100
@codewith_random
Influence Index
Winner
66
/ 100
@tmnt

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@codewith_random

0.06%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@tmnt

1.30%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Average

Following/Followers Ratio

@codewith_random

0.0033

Very influential

Excellent

@tmnt

1:11.9K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@codewith_random

2.92

Active

@tmnt

3.61

Active

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @tmnt emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @codewith_random's 2.


@codewith_random

@codewith_random excels in: Followers, Avg Comments.

FollowersAvg Comments

@tmnt

@tmnt excels in: Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Likes.

With an engagement rate of 1.30% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.

Engagement RatePostsAvg Likes

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @codewith_random has the larger audience (666.1K followers), @tmnt generates deeper engagement per post (1.30%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @codewith_random vs @tmnt

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, codewith_random leads the follower count with a difference of 3 followers. Specifically, @codewith_random has 666,069 followers while @tmnt has 666,066 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @codewith_random vs @tmnt

codewith_random vs tmntcodewith_random vs tmnt instagramcodewith_random tmnt comparisoncompare codewith_random tmntcodewith_random versus tmntcodewith_random vs tmnt followerscodewith_random vs tmnt engagementcodewith_random tmnt instagram stats