Prof. Vikas Singh vs FIBA Basketball — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Prof. Vikas Singh and FIBA Basketball Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @coding_seekho (Prof. Vikas Singh) and @fiba (FIBA Basketball). With 611.4K and 3.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
-Rejected Offer from Amazon | Founder: CoDing SeeKho -Trained 60,000+ | Nashik | Pune | Akurdi -YouTuber : 180K+ | 8+ Years Teaching Exp.
611.4K
Followers
17%
118
Following
12
Posts
50%
The best of global hoops, brought to your feed by FIBA 🏀
3.1M
Followers
83%
5K
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @fiba is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@fiba's best post achieved 77.4K likes, which is 72.4K more than @coding_seekho's top post at 5.1K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @fiba wins 5 out of 6 categories while @coding_seekho takes 0. @fiba leads overall, but @coding_seekho shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Following, where @fiba leads by 98%.
Hashtag Performance
7
With Hashtags
5
Without Hashtags
8
With Hashtags
4
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @coding_seekho uses an average of 2.9 hashtags per post compared to @fiba's 1.7.
@coding_seekho has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-38.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-51.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@coding_seekho shows a moderate -38.8% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@fiba shows a significant -51.8% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @coding_seekho demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@coding_seekho
@fiba
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @coding_seekho achieves a higher consistency score of 9%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@coding_seekho is most active on Saturday, while @fiba prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
611.4K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@coding_seekho
3.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@fiba
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@coding_seekho
0.28%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@fiba
0.62%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@coding_seekho
1:5.2K
Very influential
@fiba
0.0017
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@coding_seekho
0.02
Low@fiba
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @fiba emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @coding_seekho's 0.
@coding_seekho
No leading metrics in this comparison
@fiba
@fiba excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.62% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @fiba has the larger audience (3.1M followers), @fiba generates deeper engagement per post (0.62%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @coding_seekho
FAQ About @coding_seekho vs @fiba
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us