COSTCO DEALS vs Wikipedia is weird! — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare COSTCO DEALS and Wikipedia is weird! Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @costcodeals (COSTCO DEALS) and @depthsofwikipedia (Wikipedia is weird!). With 1.6M and 1.6M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
#️⃣1️⃣ ORIGINAL page for all things @Costco and Deals!! 📩Email for partnerships! 📌Tag us in all your posts! 📍NW🌲💁🏻♀️Not affiliated w/ Costco
1.6M
Followers
50%
996
Following
12.9K
Posts
92%
by @annierau
1.6M
Followers
50%
962
Following
1.2K
Posts
8%
In this overview, @costcodeals is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@depthsofwikipedia's best post achieved 164.5K likes, which is 141.6K more than @costcodeals's top post at 22.8K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @depthsofwikipedia leads by 96%.
Hashtag Performance
10
With Hashtags
2
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@costcodeals uses an average of 4.6 hashtags per post, while @depthsofwikipedia does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @costcodeals.
Engagement Trend
-96.7%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
+47.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@costcodeals shows a significant -96.7% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@depthsofwikipedia shows a positive 47.0% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
Overall, @depthsofwikipedia demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@costcodeals
@depthsofwikipedia
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @depthsofwikipedia achieves a higher consistency score of 29%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @depthsofwikipedia follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.6M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@costcodeals
1.6M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@depthsofwikipedia
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@costcodeals
0.23%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@depthsofwikipedia
5.19%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@costcodeals
1:1.7K
Very influential
@depthsofwikipedia
1:1.7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@costcodeals
7.86
Active@depthsofwikipedia
0.72
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @depthsofwikipedia emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @costcodeals's 2.
@costcodeals
@costcodeals excels in: Followers, Posts.
@depthsofwikipedia
@depthsofwikipedia excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 5.19% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @costcodeals has the larger audience (1.6M followers), @depthsofwikipedia generates deeper engagement per post (5.19%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @costcodeals
FAQ About @costcodeals vs @depthsofwikipedia
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us