Wikipedia is weird! vs MeidasTouch — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Wikipedia is weird! and MeidasTouch Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @depthsofwikipedia (Wikipedia is weird!) and @meidastouch (MeidasTouch). With 1.6M and 1.6M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
by @annierau
1.6M
Followers
50%
961
Following
1.2K
Posts
6%
The fastest growing independent news network in the world. We cover breaking news, politics, law and more. We are unapologetically pro-democracy.
1.6M
Followers
50%
852
Following
20.1K
Posts
94%
In this overview, @meidastouch is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Obama: Imagine if I had done any of this. Imagine if I had pulled Fox News’ credentials from the White House press corps. Imagine if I had said to law firms that were representing parties that were upset with policies my administration had initiated, that you will not be allowed into government buildings. We will punish you economically for dissenting from the Affordable Care Act or the Iran deal. We will ferret out students who protest against my policies. It’s unimaginable that the same parties that are silent now would have tolerated behavior like that from me, or a whole bunch of my predecessors.
@meidastouch's best post achieved 386.9K likes, which is 217.2K more than @depthsofwikipedia's top post at 169.7K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @meidastouch wins 4 out of 6 categories while @depthsofwikipedia takes 2. @meidastouch leads overall, but @depthsofwikipedia shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Total Posts, where @meidastouch leads by 94%.
Hashtag Performance
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
@meidastouch uses an average of 0.1 hashtags per post, while @depthsofwikipedia does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @meidastouch.
Engagement Trend
+51.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-61.6%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@depthsofwikipedia shows a positive 51.0% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@meidastouch shows a significant -61.6% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @depthsofwikipedia demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@depthsofwikipedia
@meidastouch
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @depthsofwikipedia achieves a higher consistency score of 29%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@depthsofwikipedia is most active on Wednesday, while @meidastouch prefers Sunday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.6M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@depthsofwikipedia
1.6M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@meidastouch
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@depthsofwikipedia
5.27%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@meidastouch
5.38%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@depthsofwikipedia
1:1.7K
Very influential
@meidastouch
1:1.9K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@depthsofwikipedia
0.72
Moderate@meidastouch
12.17
Very ActiveContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @meidastouch emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @depthsofwikipedia's 1.
@depthsofwikipedia
@depthsofwikipedia excels in: Avg Likes.
@meidastouch
@meidastouch excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 5.38% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @meidastouch has the larger audience (1.6M followers), @meidastouch generates deeper engagement per post (5.38%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @depthsofwikipedia
FAQ About @depthsofwikipedia vs @meidastouch
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us