Eng | Arch & Decor vs WIRED — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Eng | Arch & Decor and WIRED Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @ea.decoor (Eng | Arch & Decor) and @wired (WIRED). With 2.3M and 2.3M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
🌍 Online projects 🏆 The #1 architecture & design studio on the planet 🔻 Learn more | Saiba mais 🇧🇷 🇵🇹
2.3M
Followers
50%
55
Following
903
Posts
7%
For Future Reference. Read our latest ⬇️
2.3M
Followers
50%
76
Following
12.3K
Posts
93%
In this overview, @wired is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts

The news business isn’t just any business — it serves a vital role in our democracy, recognized by the First Amendment. But media outlets can’t serve that role if they’re bankrupt. And as a result, news readers often find themselves blocked by paywalls from reading important stories about government business. "That experience is particularly frustrating for readers who are unable to access the groundbreaking investigative reports outlets like Wired magazine have been publishing, particularly over the first couple months of the Trump administration," the Freedom of the Press Foundation release reads. "Fortunately, Wired has a solution — it’s going to stop paywalling articles that are primarily based on public records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act." Access to journalism based on public records is more important than ever at this moment, with government websites and records disappearing, DOGE doing its best to operate outside the public’s view, and the National Archive in disarray. We’re excited to be the first publication to partner with @freedomofthepressfoundation to offer this for our new coverage. And if you want to support our journalism directly, you can do so by tapping the 🔗 in bio to subscribe.
@wired's best post achieved 23.5K likes, which is 22.2K more than @ea.decoor's top post at 1.3K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @wired wins 5 out of 6 categories while @ea.decoor takes 1. @wired leads overall, but @ea.decoor shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Comments, where @wired leads by 99%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @ea.decoor uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post compared to @wired's 0.2.
@ea.decoor has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-21.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-80.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@ea.decoor shows a moderate -21.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@wired shows a significant -80.8% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @ea.decoor demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@ea.decoor
@wired
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @ea.decoor achieves a higher consistency score of 34%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @ea.decoor follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
2.3M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@ea.decoor
2.3M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@wired
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@ea.decoor
0.03%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@wired
0.17%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@ea.decoor
1:41K
Very influential
@wired
1:29.7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@ea.decoor
0.40
Moderate@wired
5.43
ActiveContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @wired emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @ea.decoor's 1.
@ea.decoor
@ea.decoor excels in: Followers.
@wired
@wired excels in: Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.17% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @ea.decoor has the larger audience (2.3M followers), @wired generates deeper engagement per post (0.17%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @ea.decoor
















FAQ About @ea.decoor vs @wired
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us

