Explaining The Universe vs Paul McCartney — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Explaining The Universe and Paul McCartney Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @explainingtheuniverse (Explaining The Universe) and @paulmccartney (Paul McCartney). With 1M and 5M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Here to explain how the Universe works 💫 ✉️ hello@explaining.co
1M
Followers
17%
13
Following
12
Posts
50%
Official Paul McCartney account managed by MPL 🐦⬛ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴏʀʏ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴏʀʏ 🐦⬛ 📲 Text me: +1(212)313-9547
5M
Followers
83%
7
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts

When Brian Cox describes falling into Venus, it quickly becomes clear that it’s one of the most hostile environments in the entire solar system. As you enter the atmosphere, you wouldn’t even make it close to the surface in one piece. Venus has an extremely thick atmosphere made mostly of carbon dioxide, with clouds of sulfuric acid, so the air itself is already toxic and corrosive. As you fall deeper, the pressure builds to crushing levels, about 90 times greater than Earth’s surface pressure, similar to being nearly a kilometer underwater in Earth’s oceans. At the same time, temperatures soar to around 465°C, which is hot enough to melt lead. According to Cox, you’d likely suffocate, burn, and be crushed all at once long before reaching the ground, making it a completely unsurvivable scenario within minutes, if not seconds. Even spacecraft struggle to survive there. Missions like the Venera 13 only lasted a little over two hours on the surface before failing under the intense heat and pressure. It’s a reminder that while Venus is often called Earth’s “twin,” it’s actually more like a planetary version of a pressure cooker, where every condition is pushed to deadly extremes.
@paulmccartney's best post achieved 177.7K likes, which is 111K more than @explainingtheuniverse's top post at 66.7K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @paulmccartney wins 4 out of 6 categories while @explainingtheuniverse takes 1. @paulmccartney leads overall, but @explainingtheuniverse shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @paulmccartney leads by 85%.
Hashtag Performance
7
With Hashtags
5
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@explainingtheuniverse uses an average of 2.4 hashtags per post, while @paulmccartney does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @explainingtheuniverse.
Engagement Trend
+162.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-30.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@explainingtheuniverse shows a positive 162.5% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@paulmccartney shows a moderate -30.0% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
Overall, @explainingtheuniverse demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@explainingtheuniverse
@paulmccartney
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @explainingtheuniverse achieves a higher consistency score of 16%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@explainingtheuniverse is most active on Thursday, while @paulmccartney prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@explainingtheuniverse
5M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@paulmccartney
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@explainingtheuniverse
1.07%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@paulmccartney
1.40%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@explainingtheuniverse
1:77.7K
Very influential
@paulmccartney
1:721.1K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@explainingtheuniverse
0.01
Low@paulmccartney
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @paulmccartney emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @explainingtheuniverse's 0.
@explainingtheuniverse
No leading metrics in this comparison
@paulmccartney
@paulmccartney excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 1.40% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @paulmccartney has the larger audience (5M followers), @paulmccartney generates deeper engagement per post (1.40%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @explainingtheuniverse
















FAQ About @explainingtheuniverse vs @paulmccartney
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us

