Exploratorium vs Science Magazine — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Exploratorium and Science Magazine Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @exploratorium (Exploratorium) and @sciencemagazine (Science Magazine). With 114.3K and 513.5K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

Tinker, touch, test, experiment, notice, and play with 650+ interactive science exhibits.

114.3K

Followers

18%

779

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.

513.5K

Followers

82%

124

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonLeading

Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.

Top Performing Posts

Top post by @exploratorium

Friday night at the @exploratorium here in San Francisco! 3 shows at 8:30pm, 9:30pm & 11:30pm with a Meet and Greet at 9:10pm! Get your tickets at the SF Exploratorium website :-)

@exploratorium
1.8K
49
Winner
Top post by @sciencemagazine

The first time Hany Farid heard the term “deepfake” was in 2017. At the time he was part of a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency project to develop tools for authenticating digital media. The project was not about AI at all. But suddenly, AI was all anybody was talking about.⁠ ⁠ The AI of the time needed thousands of images of someone’s face to create a convincing fake version. But it was clear things were going to progress quickly, Farid says. One reason was that new technologies always get faster, cheaper and more ubiquitous, he says. The other reason was sex.⁠ ⁠ The term “deepfake” comes from a Reddit user with the handle “deepfakes” who created a subreddit dedicated to nonconsensual sexual imagery—pornographic videos in which a participant’s face is replaced with the AI-generated likeness of someone else. The vast amount of harmful AI images on the internet today are still “disproportionately on the nonconsensual, fake nude side rather than on the [disinformation] side,” says Alexios Mantzarlis, a misinformation researcher who used to work on AI at Google. And, Farid adds, “Once you get sex involved on the internet, new technologies spread fast.”⁠ ⁠ By now, billions of people have access to technology that can produce photorealistic images in a matter of seconds based on the most outlandish prompts. In the beginning, AI images were often easy to detect because they lacked some of the subtle statistical signatures found in real photographs, such as sensor noise or lens artifacts.⁠ ⁠ But image generators have become increasingly good at learning and reproducing those patterns, and now they can add realistic-looking noise and imperfections. And because AI images are created from scratch rather than altered in conventional editing software, some of the detection methods Farid first developed—based on pixel-level statistical relationships left behind by manipulation—no longer work well, if at all.⁠ ⁠ To learn more, click the link in our bio.⁠ ⁠ IMAGE CREDITS: HANY FARID

@sciencemagazine
118.9K
768
1.8K likesVS118.9K likes 🏆

@sciencemagazine's best post achieved 118.9K likes, which is 117.1K more than @exploratorium's top post at 1.8K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@exploratorium(1 wins)
VS
(4 wins)@sciencemagazine
114.3K
Followers
78% ahead
513.5K
779
Following
84% ahead
124
12
Total Posts
12
0.26%
Engagement Rate
88% ahead
2.23%
285
Avg Likes
97% ahead
11.4K
8
Avg Comments
89% ahead
73
exploratorium1 - 4🏆 sciencemagazine

In this head-to-head comparison, @sciencemagazine wins 4 out of 6 categories while @exploratorium takes 1. @sciencemagazine leads overall, but @exploratorium shows notable strength in Following.

The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @sciencemagazine leads by 97%.

Hashtag Performance

@exploratorium

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help
Better Strategy
@sciencemagazine

2

With Hashtags

10

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.2
Avg Likes1K
Avg Comments7
Hashtags don't help
#worldasthmaday#teacherappreciationweek

@sciencemagazine uses an average of 0.2 hashtags per post, while @exploratorium does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @sciencemagazine.

Engagement Trend

@exploratorium
Growing

+85.2%

Engagement change

+86%

Likes

+50%

Comments

Older posts avg206
Recent posts avg381
Better Trend
@sciencemagazine
Growing

+894.4%

Engagement change

+894%

Likes

+1035%

Comments

Older posts avg2.1K
Recent posts avg20.8K

@exploratorium shows a positive 85.2% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

@sciencemagazine shows a positive 894.4% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

Overall, @sciencemagazine demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@exploratorium

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency36%

@sciencemagazine

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Friday
Consistency62%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @sciencemagazine achieves a higher consistency score of 62%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

This significant consistency gap suggests that @sciencemagazine follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.

@exploratorium is most active on Tuesday, while @sciencemagazine prefers Friday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
51
Established
@exploratorium
Reach17/25
Engagement2/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
57
Established
@sciencemagazine
Reach20/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification0/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Medium

114.3K followers

Range: 50K-500K

@exploratorium

Large

513.5K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@sciencemagazine

Influence Index
56
/ 100
@exploratorium
Influence Index
56
/ 100
@sciencemagazine

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@exploratorium

0.26%

Benchmark: 1-3%

Low

@sciencemagazine

2.23%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Average

Following/Followers Ratio

@exploratorium

0.0068

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencemagazine

1:4.1K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@exploratorium

0.10

Moderate

@sciencemagazine

0.02

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @sciencemagazine emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @exploratorium's 0.


@exploratorium

No leading metrics in this comparison

@sciencemagazine

@sciencemagazine excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 2.23% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.

FollowersEngagement RateAvg LikesAvg Comments

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @sciencemagazine has the larger audience (513.5K followers), @sciencemagazine generates deeper engagement per post (2.23%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @exploratorium

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @exploratorium vs @sciencemagazine

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, sciencemagazine leads the follower count with a difference of 399,180 followers. Specifically, @exploratorium has 114,323 followers while @sciencemagazine has 513,503 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @exploratorium vs @sciencemagazine

exploratorium vs sciencemagazineexploratorium vs sciencemagazine instagramexploratorium sciencemagazine comparisoncompare exploratorium sciencemagazineexploratorium versus sciencemagazineexploratorium vs sciencemagazine followersexploratorium vs sciencemagazine engagementexploratorium sciencemagazine instagram stats