Fernanda Paes Leme vs MIT — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Fernanda Paes Leme and MIT Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @fepaesleme (Fernanda Paes Leme) and @mit (MIT). With 5.1M and 1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Vida real... Ou não! 🎙️ @grande.surto 🏠 @casafiga.carmo
5.1M
Followers
83%
4.5K
Following
12
Posts
50%
The official account of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a world leader in research, education, and innovation.
1M
Followers
17%
563
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @fepaesleme is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@mit's best post achieved 35.9K likes, which is 35.9K more than @fepaesleme's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @fepaesleme wins 3 out of 6 categories while @mit takes 2. @fepaesleme leads overall, but @mit shows notable strength in Engagement Rate.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @mit leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
3
With Hashtags
9
Without Hashtags
5
With Hashtags
7
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @fepaesleme uses an average of 0.3 hashtags per post compared to @mit's 0.8.
@fepaesleme has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-66.7%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-58.9%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@fepaesleme shows a significant -66.7% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@mit shows a significant -58.9% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @mit demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@fepaesleme
@mit
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @fepaesleme achieves a higher consistency score of 61%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@fepaesleme is most active on Sunday, while @mit prefers Thursday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
5.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@fepaesleme
1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@mit
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@fepaesleme
0.00%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@mit
0.78%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@fepaesleme
1:1.1K
Very influential
@mit
1:1.8K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@fepaesleme
0.00
Low@mit
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
Both profiles share similar strengths, making the competition between them quite balanced.
@fepaesleme
@fepaesleme excels in: Followers, Avg Comments.
@mit
@mit excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes.
With an engagement rate of 0.78% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @fepaesleme has the larger audience (5.1M followers), @mit generates deeper engagement per post (0.78%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @fepaesleme
FAQ About @fepaesleme vs @mit
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us