Filipedmb vs Martin Ødegaard — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Filipedmb and Martin Ødegaard Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @filipedmb (Filipedmb) and @odegaard.98 (Martin Ødegaard). With 1.4M and 7.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
👤 Colecionador & YouTuber 📧 Contato@filipedmb.com 💋 TikTok +4M | YouTube +3M
1.4M
Followers
17%
819
Following
12
Posts
50%
🇳🇴 @arsenal @herrelandslaget
7.1M
Followers
83%
379
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Franz Kafka escreveu sofrimento, e eu entreguei LOOK! Porque assim… vai que passou uma baratinha, mas ela passou servindo! ★ Agora além de +1 boneca pra minha coleção, também adicionei o clássico A Metamorfose, que já está disponível no site da @darksidebooks ❤️💀 o link tá na bio deles, ok?
@odegaard.98's best post achieved 355.5K likes, which is 149K more than @filipedmb's top post at 206.5K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @odegaard.98 wins 3 out of 6 categories while @filipedmb takes 2. @odegaard.98 leads overall, but @filipedmb shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Followers, where @odegaard.98 leads by 80%.
Hashtag Performance
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@filipedmb uses an average of 0.2 hashtags per post, while @odegaard.98 does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @filipedmb.
Engagement Trend
-53.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-4.3%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@filipedmb shows a significant -53.4% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@odegaard.98 maintains a stable engagement trend with only 4.3% variation between older and recent posts, indicating consistent audience interaction.
Overall, @odegaard.98 demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@filipedmb
@odegaard.98
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @filipedmb achieves a higher consistency score of 39%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@filipedmb is most active on Thursday, while @odegaard.98 prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
1.4M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@filipedmb
7.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@odegaard.98
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@filipedmb
3.83%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@odegaard.98
2.90%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@filipedmb
1:1.7K
Very influential
@odegaard.98
1:18.8K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@filipedmb
0.01
Low@odegaard.98
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @odegaard.98 emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @filipedmb's 1.
@filipedmb
@filipedmb excels in: Engagement Rate.
With an engagement rate of 3.83% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
@odegaard.98
@odegaard.98 excels in: Followers, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @odegaard.98 has the larger audience (7.1M followers), @filipedmb generates deeper engagement per post (3.83%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @filipedmb
FAQ About @filipedmb vs @odegaard.98
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us