FOX vs James Maddison — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare FOX and James Maddison Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @fox (FOX) and @madders (James Maddison). With 2.1M and 2.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Pushing Potential Further.🏆 #ridefox THE SEARCH FOR MILLISECONDS⏱️👇 ⇩⇩⇩
2.1M
Followers
50%
415
Following
3.5K
Posts
85%
Tottenham Hotspur #10
2.1M
Followers
50%
751
Following
609
Posts
15%
In this overview, @madders is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Last October at Red Bull Rampage, @adolfsilva went down during his second run, resulting in a spinal cord injury. Since then, he’s approached recovery the same way he approached riding—focused, determined, and always moving forward. From daily rehab to wheelchair basketball, climbing, sit skiing, and training for Hyrox Adaptive competitions, he’s continuing to push himself in new ways. With input from Adolf and support from @FOX, we built a one-of-one SB140 inspired by his Rampage bike. This one-of-one SB140 is up for grabs, with all proceeds going directly to Adolf. Enter for your chance to win the bike and support Adolf as he continues pushing forward from March 23 through May 13. Link in bio to enter.
@madders's best post achieved 345.9K likes, which is 333.2K more than @fox's top post at 12.7K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @madders wins 5 out of 6 categories while @fox takes 1. @madders leads overall, but @fox shows notable strength in Total Posts.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @madders leads by 97%.
Hashtag Performance
9
With Hashtags
3
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@fox uses an average of 1.5 hashtags per post, while @madders does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @fox.
Engagement Trend
-26.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-52.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@fox shows a moderate -26.0% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@madders shows a significant -52.2% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @fox demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@fox
@madders
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @fox achieves a higher consistency score of 35%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @fox follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@fox is most active on Thursday, while @madders prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
2.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@fox
2.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@madders
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@fox
0.17%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@madders
5.75%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@fox
1:5K
Very influential
@madders
1:2.8K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@fox
1.70
Active@madders
0.29
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @madders emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @fox's 1.
@fox
@fox excels in: Posts.
@madders
@madders excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 5.75% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @madders has the larger audience (2.1M followers), @madders generates deeper engagement per post (5.75%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @fox
FAQ About @fox vs @madders
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us