Future PLUTO Hendrix vs Matheus Costa — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Future PLUTO Hendrix and Matheus Costa Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @future (Future PLUTO Hendrix) and @matheuscosta (Matheus Costa). With 25.4M and 5.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Celebrity and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

Leader

25.4M

Followers

83%

1

Following

5

Posts

29%

ComparisonLeading

Seje Feliz, haja o que hajar 😁 📩 matheuscosta@play9.com.br 📬 Caixa Postal: 11598 CEP: 22020-970

5.1M

Followers

17%

4.4K

Following

12

Posts

71%

ComparisonTrailing

In this overview, @matheuscosta is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.

Top Performing Posts

Winner
Top post by @future

…IM PROUD OF U

@future
1.7M
15.6K
Top post by @matheuscosta

LAR DOCE LAR NA MINHA CASA 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@matheuscosta
1M
58.1K
🏆 1.7M likesVS1M likes

@future's best post achieved 1.7M likes, which is 664.5K more than @matheuscosta's top post at 1M likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@future(2 wins)
VS
(4 wins)@matheuscosta
25.4M
Followers
80% ahead
5.1M
1
Following
100% ahead
4.4K
5
Total Posts
58% ahead
12
3.53%
Engagement Rate
49% ahead
6.98%
880.4K
Avg Likes
61% ahead
342.2K
14.1K
Avg Comments
14.1K
future2 - 4🏆 matheuscosta

In this head-to-head comparison, @matheuscosta wins 4 out of 6 categories while @future takes 2. @matheuscosta leads overall, but @future shows notable strength in Followers.

The most significant gap appears in Following, where @matheuscosta leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

@future

0

With Hashtags

5

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help
Better Strategy
@matheuscosta

4

With Hashtags

8

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.9
Avg Likes127.2K
Avg Comments2.8K
Hashtags don't help
#publi#panobianco#primeiravezpanobianco#cocacola#fifaworldcup

@matheuscosta uses an average of 0.9 hashtags per post, while @future does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @matheuscosta.

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@future
Declining

-47.5%

Engagement change

-48%

Likes

-8%

Comments

Older posts avg1.3M
Recent posts avg657K
@matheuscosta
Declining

-52.5%

Engagement change

-52%

Likes

-66%

Comments

Older posts avg483.1K
Recent posts avg229.5K

@future shows a moderate -47.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

@matheuscosta shows a significant -52.5% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.

Overall, @future demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@future

Posts/Week
5.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency23%

@matheuscosta

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.1
Most Active Day
Thursday
Consistency11%

Both accounts post approximately 5.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @future achieves a higher consistency score of 23%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

@future is most active on Wednesday, while @matheuscosta prefers Thursday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
76
Expert
@future
Reach25/25
Engagement20/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency1/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
81
Elite
@matheuscosta
Reach22/25
Engagement27/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Celebrity

25.4M followers

Range: 10M+

@future

Mega

5.1M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@matheuscosta

Influence Index
88
/ 100
@future
Influence Index
Winner
95
/ 100
@matheuscosta

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@future

3.53%

Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%

Good

@matheuscosta

6.98%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Excellent

Following/Followers Ratio

@future

1:25.4M

Very influential

Excellent

@matheuscosta

1:1.2K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@future

0.00

Low

@matheuscosta

0.00

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @matheuscosta emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @future's 2.


@future

@future excels in: Followers, Avg Likes.

FollowersAvg Likes

@matheuscosta

@matheuscosta excels in: Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 6.98% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.

Engagement RatePostsAvg Comments

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @future has the larger audience (25.4M followers), @matheuscosta generates deeper engagement per post (6.98%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @future

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @future vs @matheuscosta

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, future leads the follower count with a difference of 20,270,222 followers. Specifically, @future has 25,374,850 followers while @matheuscosta has 5,104,628 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @future vs @matheuscosta

future vs matheuscostafuture vs matheuscosta instagramfuture matheuscosta comparisoncompare future matheuscostafuture versus matheuscostafuture vs matheuscosta followersfuture vs matheuscosta engagementfuture matheuscosta instagram stats