GQ vs PBS — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare GQ and PBS Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @gq (GQ) and @pbs (PBS). With 7.2M and 1.5M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Big fits start here. @gqsports @gqrecommends @gqbox
7.2M
Followers
83%
987
Following
12
Posts
50%
Thank you to our viewers. Like YOU. 💙
1.5M
Followers
17%
591
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @gq is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Shawn Carter is a lot of things to a lot of people: an artist, a tastemaker, a hustler, a hip-hop elder statesman, a fashion icon, a father, and one half of the world’s ultimate power couple. How has he managed to navigate (and dominate) all the different worlds through which he moves? As he told @willwelch several years ago, it’s simple: “I walk into every room as myself.” For GQ’s April issue, we examine the many facets of Jay-Z, and the 30 years of his nearly incalculable impact on culture since Reasonable Doubt. Jay sat down with @the_summerman for his first interview in years, on camera. That story, available in both written and video formats, is accompanied by photographs shot by visual artist Rashid Johnson, now primarily known as a New York–based painter and multimedia installation artist, but long admired by GQ for his early photo work in his hometown of Chicago. Watch (or read!) the interview at the link in bio. Interview by @the_summerman Photographs by @rashidjohnson Styled by @mobolajidawodu and @juneambrose Skin by @heeezooo using Sauvage Serum Hair by @nakiarachon Set design by @heathmattioli Tailoring by Yelena Travkina Produced by @campproductions
Kalpana Chawla broke ~atmospheres 🚀 🪐 as the first Indian-American to travel to space. Coming from a small town in India, she dreamed of being an astronaut. As a NASA astronaut, she was assigned to the Columbia shuttle and her responsibilities included being the prime robotic arm operator and conducting research on low gravity. Though her life was tragically cut short in the 2003 Columbia disaster, her legacy continues to be honored by a 2020 NASA commercial spacecraft launched in her name, the science she helped advance, and the generations she inspired. #pbs #astronaut #aapiheritagemonth #womeninstem
@gq's best post achieved 105.5K likes, which is 95.3K more than @pbs's top post at 10.2K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @gq wins 5 out of 6 categories while @pbs takes 0. @gq leads overall, but @pbs shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Comments, where @gq leads by 93%.
Hashtag Performance
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
8
With Hashtags
4
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @gq uses an average of 0.2 hashtags per post compared to @pbs's 2.4.
@pbs has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-77.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
+5.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@gq shows a significant -77.1% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@pbs shows a positive 5.4% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
Overall, @pbs demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@gq
@pbs
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @pbs achieves a higher consistency score of 50%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @pbs follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@gq is most active on Saturday, while @pbs prefers Sunday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
7.2M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@gq
1.5M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@pbs
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@gq
0.25%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@pbs
0.22%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@gq
1:7.3K
Very influential
@pbs
1:2.5K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@gq
0.00
Low@pbs
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @gq emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @pbs's 0.
@gq
@gq excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.25% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
@pbs
No leading metrics in this comparison
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @gq has the larger audience (7.2M followers), @gq generates deeper engagement per post (0.25%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @gq
FAQ About @gq vs @pbs
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us