Hannah Stocking vs Ruturaj Gaikwad — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Hannah Stocking and Ruturaj Gaikwad Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @hannahstocking (Hannah Stocking) and @ruutu.131 (Ruturaj Gaikwad). With 26.7M and 5.3M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Celebrity and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Biology & Chemistry degree. 🇬🇷 Email: Hannah@madebyall.com
26.7M
Followers
83%
1.3K
Following
12
Posts
50%
@utkarshaaa13 ❤️ For media/commercial enquiries- . 📩: teamurventures@gmail.com
5.3M
Followers
17%
551
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @hannahstocking is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@ruutu.131's best post achieved 3.2M likes, which is 2.4M more than @hannahstocking's top post at 822.2K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @ruutu.131 wins 3 out of 6 categories while @hannahstocking takes 2. @ruutu.131 leads overall, but @hannahstocking shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @ruutu.131 leads by 96%.
Hashtag Performance
3
With Hashtags
9
Without Hashtags
5
With Hashtags
7
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @hannahstocking uses an average of 0.3 hashtags per post compared to @ruutu.131's 0.9.
@hannahstocking has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-5.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-66.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@hannahstocking shows a moderate -5.2% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@ruutu.131 shows a significant -66.8% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @hannahstocking demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@hannahstocking
@ruutu.131
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @hannahstocking achieves a higher consistency score of 70%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @hannahstocking follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@hannahstocking is most active on Friday, while @ruutu.131 prefers Saturday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
26.7M followers
Range: 10M+
@hannahstocking
5.3M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@ruutu.131
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@hannahstocking
0.69%
Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%
@ruutu.131
18.28%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@hannahstocking
1:20K
Very influential
@ruutu.131
1:9.7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@hannahstocking
0.00
Low@ruutu.131
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @ruutu.131 emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @hannahstocking's 1.
@hannahstocking
@hannahstocking excels in: Followers.
@ruutu.131
@ruutu.131 excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 18.28% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @hannahstocking has the larger audience (26.7M followers), @ruutu.131 generates deeper engagement per post (18.28%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @hannahstocking
FAQ About @hannahstocking vs @ruutu.131
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us