Memes 💋 vs Motion Graphics Place — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Memes 💋 and Motion Graphics Place Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @hoestproblems (Memes 💋) and @motiongraphics_p (Motion Graphics Place). With 3.9M and 777.1K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

Leader

Follow us for more.

3.9M

Followers

83%

1

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonLeading

👉🏻 Our goal is to get you INSPIRED × Supporting the #ARTISTS around the world. Support us on Patreon! 👇🏻

777.1K

Followers

17%

3.4K

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonTrailing

Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.

Top Performing Posts

Winner
Top post by @hoestproblems

No caption

@hoestproblems
27.7K
25
Top post by @motiongraphics_p

By @matt_jedrzejewski Illustration: dribbble.com/thecamiloes Software: After Effects, Illustrator, Duik or Joystick n Slider

@motiongraphics_p
686
5
🏆 27.7K likesVS686 likes

@hoestproblems's best post achieved 27.7K likes, which is 27K more than @motiongraphics_p's top post at 686 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@hoestproblems(4 wins)
VS
(1 wins)@motiongraphics_p
3.9M
Followers
80% ahead
777.1K
1
Following
100% ahead
3.4K
12
Total Posts
12
0.11%
Engagement Rate
50% ahead
0.05%
4.2K
Avg Likes
90% ahead
421
20
Avg Comments
90% ahead
2
🏆 hoestproblems4 - 1motiongraphics_p

In this head-to-head comparison, @hoestproblems wins 4 out of 6 categories while @motiongraphics_p takes 1. @hoestproblems leads overall, but @motiongraphics_p shows notable strength in Following.

The most significant gap appears in Following, where @motiongraphics_p leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

Better Strategy
@hoestproblems

4

With Hashtags

8

Without Hashtags

Avg per post1.2
Avg Likes567
Avg Comments11
Hashtags don't help
#日本#知识#事实#你知道吗#themandalorianandgrogu
@motiongraphics_p

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help

@hoestproblems uses an average of 1.2 hashtags per post, while @motiongraphics_p does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @hoestproblems.

Engagement Trend

@hoestproblems
Declining

-93.9%

Engagement change

-94%

Likes

-77%

Comments

Older posts avg8K
Recent posts avg484
Better Trend
@motiongraphics_p
Declining

-9.1%

Engagement change

-9%

Likes

+7%

Comments

Older posts avg444
Recent posts avg403

@hoestproblems shows a significant -93.9% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.

@motiongraphics_p shows a moderate -9.1% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

Overall, @motiongraphics_p demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@hoestproblems

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency41%

@motiongraphics_p

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency65%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @motiongraphics_p achieves a higher consistency score of 65%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

This significant consistency gap suggests that @motiongraphics_p follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
Winner
45
Established
@hoestproblems
Reach22/25
Engagement1/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification0/10
Authority Score
42
Established
@motiongraphics_p
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification0/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Mega

3.9M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@hoestproblems

Large

777.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@motiongraphics_p

Influence Index
Winner
51
/ 100
@hoestproblems
Influence Index
45
/ 100
@motiongraphics_p

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@hoestproblems

0.11%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@motiongraphics_p

0.05%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@hoestproblems

1:3.9M

Very influential

Excellent

@motiongraphics_p

0.0044

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@hoestproblems

0.00

Low

@motiongraphics_p

0.02

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @hoestproblems emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @motiongraphics_p's 0.


@hoestproblems

@hoestproblems excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 0.11% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.

FollowersEngagement RateAvg LikesAvg Comments

@motiongraphics_p

No leading metrics in this comparison


Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @hoestproblems has the larger audience (3.9M followers), @hoestproblems generates deeper engagement per post (0.11%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @hoestproblems

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @hoestproblems vs @motiongraphics_p

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, hoestproblems leads the follower count with a difference of 3,106,823 followers. Specifically, @hoestproblems has 3,883,909 followers while @motiongraphics_p has 777,086 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @hoestproblems vs @motiongraphics_p

hoestproblems vs motiongraphics_phoestproblems vs motiongraphics_p instagramhoestproblems motiongraphics_p comparisoncompare hoestproblems motiongraphics_phoestproblems versus motiongraphics_phoestproblems vs motiongraphics_p followershoestproblems vs motiongraphics_p engagementhoestproblems motiongraphics_p instagram stats