IFLScience vs Professor Brian Cox — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare IFLScience and Professor Brian Cox Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @iflscience (IFLScience) and @profbriancox (Professor Brian Cox). With 698.2K and 608.8K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
The lighter side of science 🚀 For more science news click here 👇👇👇👇
698.2K
Followers
53%
300
Following
10.5K
Posts
99%
Particle physics, cosmology, biology, music and increasingly interested in what it all means!
608.8K
Followers
47%
23
Following
126
Posts
1%
In this overview, @iflscience is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 3 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@profbriancox's best post achieved 17K likes, which is 16.2K more than @iflscience's top post at 770 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.
The most significant gap appears in Total Posts, where @iflscience leads by 99%.
Hashtag Performance
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
8
With Hashtags
4
Without Hashtags
@profbriancox uses an average of 2.9 hashtags per post, while @iflscience does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @profbriancox.
Engagement Trend
+31.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-3.7%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@iflscience shows a positive 31.0% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@profbriancox maintains a stable engagement trend with only 3.7% variation between older and recent posts, indicating consistent audience interaction.
Overall, @iflscience demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@iflscience
@profbriancox
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @iflscience achieves a higher consistency score of 54%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @iflscience follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@iflscience is most active on Sunday, while @profbriancox prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
698.2K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@iflscience
608.8K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@profbriancox
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@iflscience
0.04%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@profbriancox
0.86%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@iflscience
1:2.3K
Very influential
@profbriancox
1:26.5K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@iflscience
15.06
Very Active@profbriancox
0.21
ModerateContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @profbriancox emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @iflscience's 2.
@iflscience
@iflscience excels in: Followers, Posts.
@profbriancox
@profbriancox excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.86% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @iflscience has the larger audience (698.2K followers), @profbriancox generates deeper engagement per post (0.86%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @iflscience
FAQ About @iflscience vs @profbriancox
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us