Twisted vs MIT — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Twisted and MIT Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @jungletwisted (Twisted) and @mit (MIT). With 5.1M and 1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Unserious food tastes seriously good. 🌱 options - @twistedgreen 🤝 partnerships@junglecreations.com
5.1M
Followers
83%
273
Following
12
Posts
50%
The official account of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a world leader in research, education, and innovation.
1M
Followers
17%
563
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
You’ve heard of thinking outside the box… but this one is the box? 😂 This is for when you are bored of the classic banoffee. @chrisdanielcahill is dunking a whole cream cheese tub into melted chocolate to create the ultimate edible shell (yes, seriously), then loading it up with layers of banana, caramel, biscuit crumbs and a dreamy cheesecake filling. It uses the actual tub as part of the recipe… GENIUS. Full recipe via the link in bio 🍌
@mit's best post achieved 35.9K likes, which is 30.9K more than @twisted's top post at 5K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @mit wins 4 out of 6 categories while @twisted takes 1. @mit leads overall, but @twisted shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @mit leads by 95%.
Hashtag Performance
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
5
With Hashtags
7
Without Hashtags
@mit uses an average of 0.8 hashtags per post, while @twisted does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags don't impact engagement for @mit.
Engagement Trend
-9.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-57.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@twisted shows a moderate -9.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@mit shows a significant -57.8% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @twisted demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@twisted
@mit
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @twisted achieves a higher consistency score of 50%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
5.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@twisted
1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@mit
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@twisted
0.04%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@mit
0.78%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@twisted
1:18.7K
Very influential
@mit
1:1.8K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@twisted
0.00
Low@mit
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @mit emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @twisted's 1.
@twisted
@twisted excels in: Followers.
@mit
@mit excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.78% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @twisted has the larger audience (5.1M followers), @mit generates deeper engagement per post (0.78%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @twisted
FAQ About @twisted vs @mit
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us