Liam Payne vs Martin Ødegaard — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Liam Payne and Martin Ødegaard Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @liampayne (Liam Payne) and @odegaard.98 (Martin Ødegaard). With 26.5M and 7.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Celebrity and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

Leader

Teardrops. OUT NOW 💧

26.5M

Followers

79%

256

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonLeading

🇳🇴 @arsenal @herrelandslaget

7.1M

Followers

21%

379

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonTrailing

Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.

Top Performing Posts

Winner
Top post by @liampayne

Rest in peace Morgan Spurlock it was a pleasure working with you ❤️

@liampayne
3.4M
199.8K
Top post by @odegaard.98

save the date. may 30. budapest. ❤️ the Arsenal. UEFA champions league finalists.

@odegaard.98
355.5K
1.6K
🏆 3.4M likesVS355.5K likes

@liampayne's best post achieved 3.4M likes, which is 3.1M more than @odegaard.98's top post at 355.5K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@liampayne(4 wins)
VS
(1 wins)@odegaard.98
26.5M
Followers
73% ahead
7.1M
256
Following
32% ahead
379
12
Total Posts
12
3.38%
Engagement Rate
14% ahead
2.90%
858.9K
Avg Likes
76% ahead
205K
35.4K
Avg Comments
95% ahead
1.9K
🏆 liampayne4 - 1odegaard.98

In this head-to-head comparison, @liampayne wins 4 out of 6 categories while @odegaard.98 takes 1. @liampayne leads overall, but @odegaard.98 shows notable strength in Following.

The most significant gap appears in Avg Comments, where @liampayne leads by 95%.

Hashtag Performance

@liampayne

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help
@odegaard.98

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help

Neither account currently uses hashtags in their recent posts. For accounts of this size, hashtag impact on reach is typically minimal since their content is primarily distributed through the main feed algorithm. However, strategic hashtag use can still improve discoverability for new audiences.

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@liampayne
Growing

+69.3%

Engagement change

+71%

Likes

+33%

Comments

Older posts avg664.2K
Recent posts avg1.1M
@odegaard.98
Stable

-4.3%

Engagement change

-4%

Likes

+5%

Comments

Older posts avg211.4K
Recent posts avg202.4K

@liampayne shows a positive 69.3% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

@odegaard.98 maintains a stable engagement trend with only 4.3% variation between older and recent posts, indicating consistent audience interaction.

Overall, @liampayne demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@liampayne

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Thursday
Consistency14%

@odegaard.98

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency33%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @odegaard.98 achieves a higher consistency score of 33%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

@liampayne is most active on Thursday, while @odegaard.98 prefers Wednesday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
Winner
77
Expert
@liampayne
Reach25/25
Engagement20/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
69
Expert
@odegaard.98
Reach22/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Celebrity

26.5M followers

Range: 10M+

@liampayne

Mega

7.1M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@odegaard.98

Influence Index
Winner
87
/ 100
@liampayne
Influence Index
80
/ 100
@odegaard.98

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@liampayne

3.38%

Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%

Good

@odegaard.98

2.90%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

Following/Followers Ratio

@liampayne

1:103.4K

Very influential

Excellent

@odegaard.98

1:18.8K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@liampayne

0.00

Low

@odegaard.98

0.00

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @liampayne emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @odegaard.98's 0.


@liampayne

@liampayne excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 3.38% (benchmark for this size: 0.1-0.2%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.

FollowersEngagement RateAvg LikesAvg Comments

@odegaard.98

No leading metrics in this comparison


Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @liampayne has the larger audience (26.5M followers), @liampayne generates deeper engagement per post (3.38%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @liampayne

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @liampayne vs @odegaard.98

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, liampayne leads the follower count with a difference of 19,343,153 followers. Specifically, @liampayne has 26,466,544 followers while @odegaard.98 has 7,123,391 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @liampayne vs @odegaard.98

liampayne vs odegaard.98liampayne vs odegaard.98 instagramliampayne odegaard.98 comparisoncompare liampayne odegaard.98liampayne versus odegaard.98liampayne vs odegaard.98 followersliampayne vs odegaard.98 engagementliampayne odegaard.98 instagram stats