Lilly Singh vs Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Lilly Singh and Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @lilly (Lilly Singh) and @sciencefunn (Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko). With 13.2M and 2.8M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Celebrity and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Actress, Goofball, Daddy. Founder: @unicornisland 🦄
13.2M
Followers
83%
2.3K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:
2.8M
Followers
17%
322
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @lilly is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Tatiana Coelho de Sampaio is a Brazilian researcher working in regenerative biology. She’s been studying how the body (especially the nervous system) can repair itself for decades. What she actually spent ~30 years on Her main focus is a molecule called polylaminin (derived from laminin, a protein in our tissues). The big idea: Help damaged spinal cord tissue regenerate, and potentially restore movement in people with paralysis The central nervous system (brain/spinal cord) was long thought unable to regenerate properly What the “breakthrough” is about Her team found that polylaminin can: - stimulate nerve fiber (axon) growth - reduce inflammation - help reorganize damaged tissue In animal studies and early human observations, there were signs of partial recovery of movement after spinal cord injury. There are even viral clips showing patients regaining some movement after treatment. We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.
@sciencefunn's best post achieved 139.4K likes, which is 139.4K more than @lilly's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @lilly wins 3 out of 6 categories while @sciencefunn takes 2. @lilly leads overall, but @sciencefunn shows notable strength in Engagement Rate.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @sciencefunn leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
3
With Hashtags
9
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @lilly uses an average of 0.2 hashtags per post compared to @sciencefunn's 1.0.
@sciencefunn has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-38.3%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-87.6%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@lilly shows a moderate -38.3% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@sciencefunn shows a significant -87.6% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @lilly demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@lilly
@sciencefunn
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @lilly achieves a higher consistency score of 8%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
13.2M followers
Range: 10M+
@lilly
2.8M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@sciencefunn
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@lilly
0.00%
Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%
@sciencefunn
1.04%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@lilly
1:5.8K
Very influential
@sciencefunn
1:8.6K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@lilly
0.00
Low@sciencefunn
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
Both profiles share similar strengths, making the competition between them quite balanced.
@lilly
@lilly excels in: Followers, Avg Comments.
@sciencefunn
@sciencefunn excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes.
With an engagement rate of 1.04% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @lilly has the larger audience (13.2M followers), @sciencefunn generates deeper engagement per post (1.04%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @lilly
FAQ About @lilly vs @sciencefunn
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us