MakeUp Videos vs Oasis — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare MakeUp Videos and Oasis Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @makeup.feed (MakeUp Videos) and @oasis (Oasis). With 982.7K and 4.9M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

💌 - makeupfeedinc@gmail.com Tag @makeup.feed @nail.feed @hair.feed to be featured

982.7K

Followers

17%

36

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

“People will never, ever forget the way that you made them feel.” Official store updates: @shop.oasisinet

4.9M

Followers

83%

2

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonLeading

Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.

Top Performing Posts

Top post by @makeup.feed

😳

@makeup.feed
409
5
Winner
Top post by @oasis

No caption

@oasis
1.3M
17.3K
409 likesVS1.3M likes 🏆

@oasis's best post achieved 1.3M likes, which is 1.3M more than @makeup.feed's top post at 409 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@makeup.feed(1 wins)
VS
(4 wins)@oasis
982.7K
Followers
80% ahead
4.9M
36
Following
94% ahead
2
12
Total Posts
12
0.02%
Engagement Rate
100% ahead
5.25%
153
Avg Likes
100% ahead
254.7K
1
Avg Comments
100% ahead
2.9K
makeup.feed1 - 4🏆 oasis

In this head-to-head comparison, @oasis wins 4 out of 6 categories while @makeup.feed takes 1. @oasis leads overall, but @makeup.feed shows notable strength in Following.

The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @oasis leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

Better Strategy
@makeup.feed

3

With Hashtags

9

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.7
Avg Likes146
Avg Comments2
Hashtags don't help
#mascara#glitter#glitternails#transformation#beauty
@oasis

5

With Hashtags

7

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.4
Avg Likes135.1K
Avg Comments519
Hashtags don't help
#oasislive25#onthisday

Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @makeup.feed uses an average of 0.7 hashtags per post compared to @oasis's 0.4.

@makeup.feed has a more effective hashtag strategy

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@makeup.feed
Declining

-27.3%

Engagement change

-28%

Likes

+43%

Comments

Older posts avg179
Recent posts avg130
@oasis
Declining

-62.5%

Engagement change

-62%

Likes

-80%

Comments

Older posts avg374.7K
Recent posts avg140.4K

@makeup.feed shows a moderate -27.3% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

@oasis shows a significant -62.5% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.

Overall, @makeup.feed demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@makeup.feed

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Monday
Consistency42%

@oasis

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Friday
Consistency15%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @makeup.feed achieves a higher consistency score of 42%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

This significant consistency gap suggests that @makeup.feed follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.

@makeup.feed is most active on Monday, while @oasis prefers Friday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
42
Established
@makeup.feed
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification0/10
Authority Score
Winner
78
Expert
@oasis
Reach22/25
Engagement24/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Large

982.7K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@makeup.feed

Mega

4.9M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@oasis

Influence Index
45
/ 100
@makeup.feed
Influence Index
Winner
91
/ 100
@oasis

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@makeup.feed

0.02%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@oasis

5.25%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Good

Following/Followers Ratio

@makeup.feed

1:27.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@oasis

1:2.5M

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@makeup.feed

0.01

Low

@oasis

0.00

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @oasis emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @makeup.feed's 0.


@makeup.feed

No leading metrics in this comparison

@oasis

@oasis excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 5.25% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.

FollowersEngagement RateAvg LikesAvg Comments

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @oasis has the larger audience (4.9M followers), @oasis generates deeper engagement per post (5.25%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @makeup.feed

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @makeup.feed vs @oasis

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, oasis leads the follower count with a difference of 3,920,976 followers. Specifically, @makeup.feed has 982,691 followers while @oasis has 4,903,667 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @makeup.feed vs @oasis

makeup.feed vs oasismakeup.feed vs oasis instagrammakeup.feed oasis comparisoncompare makeup.feed oasismakeup.feed versus oasismakeup.feed vs oasis followersmakeup.feed vs oasis engagementmakeup.feed oasis instagram stats