National Geographic Science vs Thomas DeLauer — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare National Geographic Science and Thomas DeLauer Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @natgeoscience (National Geographic Science) and @thomasdelauer (Thomas DeLauer). With 9.8M and 2M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Uncover wondrous scientific discoveries with National Geographic.
9.8M
Followers
83%
85
Following
12
Posts
50%
Husband, Dad, 100% Nerd 4 Million YouTube Subscribers Nutrition Coach to Professional Athletes (NFL, MLB, Special Forces) Here’s my FREE Meal Plan
2M
Followers
17%
1.3K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Each spring, millions of viewers tune in to watch Sweden’s annual moose migration as the animals move through Scandinavian forests. What began in 2019 as part of Scandinavia’s “slow TV” movement has evolved into a global phenomenon with a dedicated community of fans. Head to the link in bio to learn more about the Great Moose Migration. Video by SVT
Great day filming all things diet & training @alanritchson and @thomasdelauer dove deep into what goes into building an action-star physique for Reacher. We went into the detail of protein intake, rep ranges, supplementation and different ways to maintain energy levels when in a caloric deficit. Episode dropping soon 💥🤙🏼 #protein #muscle
@thomasdelauer's best post achieved 55.4K likes, which is 35.4K more than @natgeoscience's top post at 20K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @thomasdelauer wins 4 out of 6 categories while @natgeoscience takes 1. @thomasdelauer leads overall, but @natgeoscience shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Following, where @thomasdelauer leads by 94%.
Hashtag Performance
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
@thomasdelauer uses an average of 0.8 hashtags per post, while @natgeoscience does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @thomasdelauer.
Engagement Trend
-22.3%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-90.6%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@natgeoscience shows a moderate -22.3% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
@thomasdelauer shows a significant -90.6% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @natgeoscience demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@natgeoscience
@thomasdelauer
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @thomasdelauer achieves a higher consistency score of 11%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@natgeoscience is most active on Monday, while @thomasdelauer prefers Tuesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
9.8M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@natgeoscience
2M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@thomasdelauer
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@natgeoscience
0.07%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@thomasdelauer
0.63%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@natgeoscience
1:115.7K
Very influential
@thomasdelauer
1:1.5K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@natgeoscience
0.00
Low@thomasdelauer
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @thomasdelauer emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @natgeoscience's 1.
@natgeoscience
@natgeoscience excels in: Followers.
@thomasdelauer
@thomasdelauer excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.63% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @natgeoscience has the larger audience (9.8M followers), @thomasdelauer generates deeper engagement per post (0.63%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @natgeoscience
FAQ About @natgeoscience vs @thomasdelauer
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us