Nitro Circus vs Science Pulse — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Nitro Circus and Science Pulse Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @nitrocircus (Nitro Circus) and @science__pulse (Science Pulse). With 5.5M and 1.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Pushing the limits and breaking boundaries in action sports. Summer 2026 tour on sale now!
5.5M
Followers
83%
989
Following
12
Posts
50%
DM for Paid Collaborations & Brand Work
1.1M
Followers
17%
15
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @nitrocircus is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
@nitrocircus's best post achieved 8.7M likes, which is 8.7M more than @science__pulse's top post at 8.1K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @nitrocircus wins 5 out of 6 categories while @science__pulse takes 0. @nitrocircus leads overall, but @science__pulse shows notable strength in —.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @nitrocircus leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @nitrocircus uses an average of 0.5 hashtags per post compared to @science__pulse's 0.8.
@science__pulse has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-99.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-29.5%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@nitrocircus shows a significant -99.2% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@science__pulse shows a moderate -29.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
Overall, @science__pulse demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@nitrocircus
@science__pulse
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @science__pulse achieves a higher consistency score of 52%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @science__pulse follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
5.5M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@nitrocircus
1.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@science__pulse
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@nitrocircus
15.71%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@science__pulse
0.21%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@nitrocircus
1:5.5K
Very influential
@science__pulse
1:73.1K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@nitrocircus
0.00
Low@science__pulse
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @nitrocircus emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @science__pulse's 0.
@nitrocircus
@nitrocircus excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 15.71% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
@science__pulse
No leading metrics in this comparison
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @nitrocircus has the larger audience (5.5M followers), @nitrocircus generates deeper engagement per post (15.71%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @nitrocircus
FAQ About @nitrocircus vs @science__pulse
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us