Simon Squibb vs The History Source — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Simon Squibb and The History Source Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @simonsquibb (Simon Squibb) and @thehistory.source (The History Source). With 5.7M and 1.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Mega and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
-Founder @helpbnk & @dreambrew -Helping 10 million people start a business -Best-selling author of What’s Your Dream 👉DM me “Dream” to get free help👈
5.7M
Followers
83%
7.9K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Interesting and entertaining history content covering all time periods and eras🏛️📜🏺 📽️New posts daily 👉historysourcemedia@gmail.com for collabs
1.1M
Followers
17%
1.6K
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @simonsquibb is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
How would you like to get into shape simply by relaxing and enjoying a massage? Sound too good to be true? Well that’s exactly what “slenderizing” massage machines promised back in the mid twentieth century. In the 1940s, “slenderizing salons” gained popularity as places where women could go to achieve the ideal body shape through the use of various mechanical devices, such as rollers and massagers. These salons, which were early version of a women’s gym, promised weight loss and body contouring without the need for strenuous exercise or diet, capitalizing on the era’s beauty standards that favored a slimmer figure. The machines often involved passive exercise, where clients would lie down or sit while the devices vibrated or kneaded their bodies believing that the machines would reduce fat and promote firmness. Video source: BritishPathe archives #history #1940s #workout #fitness #exercise #womensfitness #gym #1940sfashion #gymgirl #weightloss #historyfacts #retro #vintage #didyouknow #historylovers #historical
@simonsquibb's best post achieved 1.4M likes, which is 913.7K more than @thehistory.source's top post at 498K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @simonsquibb wins 4 out of 6 categories while @thehistory.source takes 1. @simonsquibb leads overall, but @thehistory.source shows notable strength in Engagement Rate.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Comments, where @simonsquibb leads by 86%.
Hashtag Performance
7
With Hashtags
5
Without Hashtags
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @simonsquibb uses an average of 1.8 hashtags per post compared to @thehistory.source's 7.1.
@thehistory.source has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-97.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-97.9%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@simonsquibb shows a significant -97.1% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@thehistory.source shows a significant -97.9% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @simonsquibb demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@simonsquibb
@thehistory.source
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @simonsquibb achieves a higher consistency score of 15%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@simonsquibb is most active on Friday, while @thehistory.source prefers Thursday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
5.7M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@simonsquibb
1.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@thehistory.source
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@simonsquibb
5.30%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@thehistory.source
8.88%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@simonsquibb
0.0014
Very influential
@thehistory.source
0.0014
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@simonsquibb
0.00
Low@thehistory.source
0.01
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @simonsquibb emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @thehistory.source's 1.
@simonsquibb
@simonsquibb excels in: Followers, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
@thehistory.source
@thehistory.source excels in: Engagement Rate.
With an engagement rate of 8.88% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @simonsquibb has the larger audience (5.7M followers), @thehistory.source generates deeper engagement per post (8.88%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @simonsquibb
FAQ About @simonsquibb vs @thehistory.source
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us