American Museum of Natural History vs Science Channel — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare American Museum of Natural History and Science Channel Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @amnh (American Museum of Natural History) and @sciencechannel (Science Channel). With 579.1K and 2.7M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Official Instagram of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Open daily, 10 am–5:30 pm. → Home of the Margaret Mead Film Festival
579.1K
Followers
18%
314
Following
12
Posts
50%
For the love of science.
2.7M
Followers
82%
217
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
@amnh's best post achieved 168K likes, which is 167.1K more than @sciencechannel's top post at 924 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @amnh wins 4 out of 6 categories while @sciencechannel takes 1. @amnh leads overall, but @sciencechannel shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @amnh leads by 99%.
Hashtag Performance
11
With Hashtags
1
Without Hashtags
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @amnh uses an average of 4.6 hashtags per post compared to @sciencechannel's 2.8.
@amnh has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-95.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-0.8%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@amnh shows a significant -95.0% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@sciencechannel maintains a stable engagement trend with only 0.8% variation between older and recent posts, indicating consistent audience interaction.
Overall, @sciencechannel demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@amnh
@sciencechannel
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @sciencechannel achieves a higher consistency score of 70%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @sciencechannel follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@amnh is most active on Thursday, while @sciencechannel prefers Friday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
579.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@amnh
2.7M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@sciencechannel
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@amnh
2.90%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@sciencechannel
0.02%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@amnh
1:1.8K
Very influential
@sciencechannel
1:12.2K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@amnh
0.02
Low@sciencechannel
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @amnh emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @sciencechannel's 1.
@amnh
@amnh excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 2.90% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
@sciencechannel
@sciencechannel excels in: Followers.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @sciencechannel has the larger audience (2.7M followers), @amnh generates deeper engagement per post (2.90%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @amnh
FAQ About @amnh vs @sciencechannel
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us