American Museum of Natural History vs Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare American Museum of Natural History and Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @amnh (American Museum of Natural History) and @sciencefunn (Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko). With 578.9K and 2.8M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
Official Instagram of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Open daily, 10 am–5:30 pm. → Home of the Margaret Mead Film Festival
578.9K
Followers
17%
314
Following
12
Posts
50%
Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:
2.8M
Followers
83%
322
Following
12
Posts
50%
In this overview, @sciencefunn is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Tatiana Coelho de Sampaio is a Brazilian researcher working in regenerative biology. She’s been studying how the body (especially the nervous system) can repair itself for decades. What she actually spent ~30 years on Her main focus is a molecule called polylaminin (derived from laminin, a protein in our tissues). The big idea: Help damaged spinal cord tissue regenerate, and potentially restore movement in people with paralysis The central nervous system (brain/spinal cord) was long thought unable to regenerate properly What the “breakthrough” is about Her team found that polylaminin can: - stimulate nerve fiber (axon) growth - reduce inflammation - help reorganize damaged tissue In animal studies and early human observations, there were signs of partial recovery of movement after spinal cord injury. There are even viral clips showing patients regaining some movement after treatment. We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.
@amnh's best post achieved 168K likes, which is 28.6K more than @sciencefunn's top post at 139.4K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @sciencefunn wins 4 out of 6 categories while @amnh takes 1. @sciencefunn leads overall, but @amnh shows notable strength in Engagement Rate.
The most significant gap appears in Followers, where @sciencefunn leads by 79%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
3
With Hashtags
9
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @amnh uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post compared to @sciencefunn's 1.0.
@amnh has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-95.9%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-87.6%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@amnh shows a significant -95.9% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
@sciencefunn shows a significant -87.6% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @sciencefunn demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@amnh
@sciencefunn
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @amnh achieves a higher consistency score of 9%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@amnh is most active on Thursday, while @sciencefunn prefers Tuesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
578.9K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@amnh
2.8M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@sciencefunn
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@amnh
3.08%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@sciencefunn
1.04%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@amnh
1:1.8K
Very influential
@sciencefunn
1:8.6K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@amnh
0.02
Low@sciencefunn
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @sciencefunn emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @amnh's 1.
@amnh
@amnh excels in: Engagement Rate.
With an engagement rate of 3.08% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates excellent audience interaction.
@sciencefunn
@sciencefunn excels in: Followers, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @sciencefunn has the larger audience (2.8M followers), @amnh generates deeper engagement per post (3.08%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @amnh
FAQ About @amnh vs @sciencefunn
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us