AsapSCIENCE vs Harvard University — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare AsapSCIENCE and Harvard University Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @asapscience (AsapSCIENCE) and @harvard (Harvard University). With 638.4K and 3.1M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

making science make sense 🤓😎🏳️‍🌈

638.4K

Followers

17%

860

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

Sharing photos of #Harvard on campus and around the world.

3.1M

Followers

83%

189

Following

12

Posts

50%

ComparisonLeading

Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.

Top Performing Posts

Winner
Top post by @asapscience

The call is coming from inside the house

@asapscience
49.4K
638
Top post by @harvard

Mattea Conforti is a Harvard College student, but she's also Becka Grove in Hulu's “The Testaments,” the sequel to “The Handmaid’s Tale." It was during her biotech ethics course that she got the call telling her she'd landed the role. “I was crying because I was just so happy," she recalled. "Then I had to go back into my lecture and continue taking notes.” Acting since she was young, Mattea starred as “Matilda” on Broadway when she was 9. She's also played Young Anna in “Frozen” on Broadway, and performed the voice of Young Elsa in the “Frozen 2" movie. While on campus, she likes studying in the many coffee shops in Harvard Square, and looks forward to the Harvard-Yale game each year. Although she hasn’t yet declared a concentration, she's interested in psychology, government, and Theater, Dance & Media. “I’ve never been in such a motivating and passionate environment,” she says of Harvard. “There are people I would have never even dreamed of meeting without coming to school here. It’s a blessing to be here.” Photo courtesy of Mattea Conforti

@harvard
24.1K
85
🏆 49.4K likesVS24.1K likes

@asapscience's best post achieved 49.4K likes, which is 25.3K more than @harvard's top post at 24.1K likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@asapscience(4 wins)
VS
(1 wins)@harvard
638.4K
Followers
79% ahead
3.1M
860
Following
78% ahead
189
12
Total Posts
12
1.20%
Engagement Rate
84% ahead
0.20%
7.5K
Avg Likes
20% ahead
6K
169
Avg Comments
62% ahead
64
🏆 asapscience4 - 1harvard

In this head-to-head comparison, @asapscience wins 4 out of 6 categories while @harvard takes 1. @asapscience leads overall, but @harvard shows notable strength in Followers.

The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @asapscience leads by 84%.

Hashtag Performance

Better Strategy
@asapscience

8

With Hashtags

4

Without Hashtags

Avg per post2.2
Avg Likes2.8K
Avg Comments51
Hashtags don't help
#sidenotepod#asapscience#science#birding#birdwatch
@harvard

3

With Hashtags

9

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.3
Avg Likes2.5K
Avg Comments65
Hashtags don't help
#harvard26#harvardinspring

Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @asapscience uses an average of 2.2 hashtags per post compared to @harvard's 0.3.

@asapscience has a more effective hashtag strategy

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@asapscience
Growing

+233.7%

Engagement change

+233%

Likes

+266%

Comments

Older posts avg3.5K
Recent posts avg11.8K
@harvard
Declining

-75.7%

Engagement change

-76%

Likes

-28%

Comments

Older posts avg9.8K
Recent posts avg2.4K

@asapscience shows a positive 233.7% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

@harvard shows a significant -75.7% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.

Overall, @asapscience demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@asapscience

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.1
Most Active Day
Monday
Consistency5%

@harvard

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency72%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @harvard achieves a higher consistency score of 72%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

This significant consistency gap suggests that @harvard follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.

@asapscience is most active on Monday, while @harvard prefers Tuesday.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
Winner
62
Expert
@asapscience
Reach20/25
Engagement10/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
55
Established
@harvard
Reach22/25
Engagement1/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Large

638.4K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@asapscience

Mega

3.1M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@harvard

Influence Index
66
/ 100
@asapscience
Influence Index
66
/ 100
@harvard

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@asapscience

1.20%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Average

@harvard

0.20%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@asapscience

0.0013

Very influential

Excellent

@harvard

1:16.3K

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@asapscience

0.02

Low

@harvard

0.00

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @asapscience emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @harvard's 1.


@asapscience

@asapscience excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.

With an engagement rate of 1.20% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.

Engagement RateAvg LikesAvg Comments

@harvard

@harvard excels in: Followers.

Followers

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @harvard has the larger audience (3.1M followers), @asapscience generates deeper engagement per post (1.20%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @asapscience

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @asapscience vs @harvard

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, harvard leads the follower count with a difference of 2,448,662 followers. Specifically, @asapscience has 638,385 followers while @harvard has 3,087,047 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @asapscience vs @harvard

asapscience vs harvardasapscience vs harvard instagramasapscience harvard comparisoncompare asapscience harvardasapscience versus harvardasapscience vs harvard followersasapscience vs harvard engagementasapscience harvard instagram stats