Ankit Dungawat vs FOOS GONE WILD — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and FOOS GONE WILD Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @foosgonewild (FOOS GONE WILD). With 673.3K and 3.4M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
673.3K
Followers
17%
2.2K
Following
12
Posts
50%
THE VIEWS/OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THE COMMENT SECTION DO NOT REFLECT THOSE OF FGW 🚫NO LAMES | NO RACISTS🚫
3.4M
Followers
83%
387
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Stop searching random icons on Google — use one powerful library instead.✅ 6000+ free open-source icons you can customize, download, or use directly in code 🚀💻 👉 Comment “ICONS” and I’ll send you the link. tabler icons, free icon library, svg icons free, developer icon resources, ui icons for web, open source icons, react icons library #UIUX#WebDevelopment#FrontendDeveloper#DesignResources#DeveloperTools
@foosgonewild's best post achieved 368.6K likes, which is 368.6K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @foosgonewild wins 4 out of 6 categories while @codewith_random takes 1. @foosgonewild leads overall, but @codewith_random shows notable strength in Following.
The most significant gap appears in Avg Likes, where @foosgonewild leads by 100%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post compared to @foosgonewild's 0.1.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
+5.2%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-90.1%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random shows a positive 5.2% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@foosgonewild shows a significant -90.1% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@foosgonewild
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @foosgonewild achieves a higher consistency score of 14%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@codewith_random is most active on Tuesday, while @foosgonewild prefers Sunday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
673.3K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
3.4M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@foosgonewild
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.04%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@foosgonewild
1.93%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@foosgonewild
1:8.7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
0.02
Low@foosgonewild
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @foosgonewild emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 4 metric wins compared to @codewith_random's 0.
@codewith_random
No leading metrics in this comparison
@foosgonewild
@foosgonewild excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 1.93% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates good audience interaction.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @foosgonewild has the larger audience (3.4M followers), @foosgonewild generates deeper engagement per post (1.93%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @foosgonewild
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us