Ankit Dungawat vs Lana Rose — Instagram Profile Comparison

Compare Ankit Dungawat and Lana Rose Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.

This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @lanarose786 (Lana Rose). With 673.7K and 3.4M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.

@
VS
@

Profile Overview

💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑‍🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com

673.7K

Followers

17%

2.2K

Following

12

Posts

60%

ComparisonTrailing
Leader

Trust in God Account managed by The Lana Rose Team.

3.4M

Followers

83%

0

Following

8

Posts

40%

ComparisonLeading

In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.

Top Performing Posts

Top post by @codewith_random

Stop searching random icons on Google — use one powerful library instead.✅ 6000+ free open-source icons you can customize, download, or use directly in code 🚀💻 👉 Comment “ICONS” and I’ll send you the link. tabler icons, free icon library, svg icons free, developer icon resources, ui icons for web, open source icons, react icons library #UIUX#WebDevelopment#FrontendDeveloper#DesignResources#DeveloperTools

@codewith_random
-1
208
Winner
Top post by @lanarose786

‘Never let me go’ music video out now. Link in bio.

@lanarose786
14.1K
0
-1 likesVS14.1K likes 🏆

@lanarose786's best post achieved 14.1K likes, which is 14.2K more than @codewith_random's top post at -1 likes. A strong top post typically indicates either viral content, high audience resonance, or effective use of Instagram's recommendation algorithm.

Key Metrics Comparison

@codewith_random(3 wins)
VS
(3 wins)@lanarose786
673.7K
Followers
80% ahead
3.4M
2.2K
Following
100% ahead
0
12
Total Posts
33% ahead
8
0.04%
Engagement Rate
82% ahead
0.24%
-1
Avg Likes
100% ahead
8.1K
299
Avg Comments
57% ahead
130
codewith_random3 - 3lanarose786

In this head-to-head comparison, each account wins 3 out of 6 categories — an evenly matched comparison with each account excelling in different areas.

The most significant gap appears in Following, where @codewith_random leads by 100%.

Hashtag Performance

Better Strategy
@codewith_random

12

With Hashtags

0

Without Hashtags

Avg per post5.0
Avg Likes-1
Avg Comments299
Hashtags boost engagement
#programming#webdevelopment#learntocode#ai#frontenddeveloper
@lanarose786

0

With Hashtags

8

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags don't help

@codewith_random uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post, while @lanarose786 does not currently use hashtags. The data shows that hashtags boost engagement for @codewith_random.

Engagement Trend

Better Trend
@codewith_random
Growing

+104.9%

Engagement change

+0%

Likes

+104%

Comments

Older posts avg196
Recent posts avg401
@lanarose786
Declining

-44.5%

Engagement change

-46%

Likes

+66%

Comments

Older posts avg10.6K
Recent posts avg5.9K

@codewith_random shows a positive 104.9% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.

@lanarose786 shows a moderate -44.5% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.

Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.

Posting Frequency

@codewith_random

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency11%

@lanarose786

Posts/Week
8.0
Avg Days Between
0.1
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency38%

Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 8.0 times per week respectively. @lanarose786 achieves a higher consistency score of 38%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.

This significant consistency gap suggests that @lanarose786 follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.

Advanced Analytics

Authority Score
52
Established
@codewith_random
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency2/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
55
Established
@lanarose786
Reach22/25
Engagement2/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency1/15
Verification10/10

The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".

Account Classification

Large

673.7K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@codewith_random

Mega

3.4M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@lanarose786

Influence Index
60
/ 100
@codewith_random
Influence Index
Winner
66
/ 100
@lanarose786

The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.

Engagement Quality

@codewith_random

0.04%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@lanarose786

0.24%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@codewith_random

0.0033

Very influential

Excellent

@lanarose786

1:InfinityM

Very influential

Excellent

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@codewith_random

0.02

Low

@lanarose786

0.00

Low

Content Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.

Expert Verdict & Conclusion

Overall Analysis:

After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @lanarose786 emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @codewith_random's 2.


@codewith_random

@codewith_random excels in: Posts, Avg Comments.

PostsAvg Comments

@lanarose786

@lanarose786 excels in: Followers, Engagement Rate, Avg Likes.

With an engagement rate of 0.24% (benchmark for this size: 0.2-0.5%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.

FollowersEngagement RateAvg Likes

Conclusion

This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @lanarose786 has the larger audience (3.4M followers), @lanarose786 generates deeper engagement per post (0.24%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.

Other Comparisons You Might Like

Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random

Analysis FAQ

FAQ About @codewith_random vs @lanarose786

Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics

Based on our real-time data, lanarose786 leads the follower count with a difference of 2,693,083 followers. Specifically, @codewith_random has 673,704 followers while @lanarose786 has 3,366,787 followers. Follower count is one of the most visible Instagram metrics and indicates the overall reach of each account. However, a higher follower count doesn't always mean better performance — engagement rate and content quality are equally important factors to consider when comparing Instagram profiles.

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparison Searches for @codewith_random vs @lanarose786

codewith_random vs lanarose786codewith_random vs lanarose786 instagramcodewith_random lanarose786 comparisoncompare codewith_random lanarose786codewith_random versus lanarose786codewith_random vs lanarose786 followerscodewith_random vs lanarose786 engagementcodewith_random lanarose786 instagram stats