Ankit Dungawat vs Noom — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and Noom Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @noom (Noom). With 664.2K and 664.5K followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Large level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
664.2K
Followers
50%
2.2K
Following
1.9K
Posts
61%
Go micro with Noom for big results - microhabits, microwins, and even microdose GLP-1s 📱🧠💉
664.5K
Followers
50%
320
Following
1.2K
Posts
39%
In this overview, @codewith_random is currently leading the comparison with stronger numbers in 2 out of 3 primary metrics. The percentage bars reflect each account's share relative to the combined total of both profiles.
Top Performing Posts
Sketch → real UI in seconds 🤯 I had a basic idea for a sneaker website… nothing polished, just a rough sketch. Instead of designing it manually, I tested the new Uni-1 model from Luma. And this is where it gets interesting — it didn’t just generate a random design… it actually understood the structure behind what I was trying to build. Everything from layout to sections feels intentional. This feels less like prompting… and more like working with something that actually gets your idea. Compared to GPT Image 1.5 / NB Pro, this feels way more structured and usable. Generated with Luma Uni-1 🚀 And honestly… this is just 1% of what it can do. Comment “TRY” and I’ll send you the link in DM 🔥 @lumalabsai #lumaai #uni1 #aitools #generativeai #aiimages
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @codewith_random wins 4 out of 6 categories while @noom takes 1. @codewith_random leads overall, but @noom shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @codewith_random leads by 98%.
Hashtag Performance
11
With Hashtags
1
Without Hashtags
1
With Hashtags
11
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 4.6 hashtags per post compared to @noom's 0.1.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
+185.9%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-40.0%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random shows a positive 185.9% engagement growth, indicating increasing audience interest and content resonance.
@noom shows a moderate -40.0% engagement decline, which is common for accounts adjusting their content strategy.
Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@noom
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @noom achieves a higher consistency score of 17%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
@codewith_random is most active on Saturday, while @noom prefers Wednesday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
664.2K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
664.5K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@noom
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.04%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@noom
0.00%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@noom
1:2.1K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
2.92
Active@noom
1.88
ActiveContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @codewith_random emerges as the clear leader in this comparison with 3 metric wins compared to @noom's 1.
@codewith_random
@codewith_random excels in: Engagement Rate, Posts, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.04% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
@noom
@noom excels in: Followers.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @noom has the larger audience (664.5K followers), @codewith_random generates deeper engagement per post (0.04%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @noom
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us