Ankit Dungawat vs Women's Best — Instagram Profile Comparison
Compare Ankit Dungawat and Women's Best Instagram profiles side-by-side. Analyze followers, engagement rates, and account performance.
This page provides a detailed Instagram comparison between @codewith_random (Ankit Dungawat) and @womensbest (Women's Best). With 674.8K and 3.4M followers respectively, both accounts are classified as Large and Mega level Instagram profiles. Our analysis covers key areas including follower statistics, engagement rates, posting frequency, hashtag strategy, and authority scores.
Profile Overview
💻 Coding Made Simple & Fun 🧑🚀 Founder – @rapiddmofficial 🤝 DM for Collabs & Promotions ✉️ CodeWithRandom@gmail.com
674.8K
Followers
17%
2.2K
Following
12
Posts
50%
Empowering Women Through Fitness & Wellness Now Live: Spring Neutrals ✨👇
3.4M
Followers
83%
85
Following
12
Posts
50%
Both accounts show evenly matched primary metrics in this overview, with each profile holding the advantage in different areas.
Top Performing Posts
Stop searching random icons on Google — use one powerful library instead.✅ 6000+ free open-source icons you can customize, download, or use directly in code 🚀💻 👉 Comment “ICONS” and I’ll send you the link. tabler icons, free icon library, svg icons free, developer icon resources, ui icons for web, open source icons, react icons library #UIUX#WebDevelopment#FrontendDeveloper#DesignResources#DeveloperTools
Key Metrics Comparison
In this head-to-head comparison, @codewith_random wins 3 out of 6 categories while @womensbest takes 1. @codewith_random leads overall, but @womensbest shows notable strength in Followers.
The most significant gap appears in Engagement Rate, where @codewith_random leads by 98%.
Hashtag Performance
12
With Hashtags
0
Without Hashtags
11
With Hashtags
1
Without Hashtags
Both accounts employ hashtag strategies. @codewith_random uses an average of 5.0 hashtags per post compared to @womensbest's 0.9.
@codewith_random has a more effective hashtag strategy
Engagement Trend
-3.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
-53.4%
Engagement change
Likes
Comments
@codewith_random maintains a stable engagement trend with only 3.4% variation between older and recent posts, indicating consistent audience interaction.
@womensbest shows a significant -53.4% engagement decline. This sharp drop may be influenced by one or more viral older posts that inflated the historical average, rather than indicating a genuine loss of audience interest.
Overall, @codewith_random demonstrates the stronger engagement trajectory in this comparison.
Posting Frequency
@codewith_random
@womensbest
Both accounts post approximately 12.0 and 12.0 times per week respectively. @womensbest achieves a higher consistency score of 51%, meaning their posting schedule is more predictable.
This significant consistency gap suggests that @womensbest follows a more disciplined content calendar, which typically results in better algorithm favorability on Instagram.
@codewith_random is most active on Tuesday, while @womensbest prefers Thursday.
Advanced Analytics
The Authority Score is calculated from five weighted factors: Reach (max 25), Engagement (max 30), Follower-to-Following Ratio (max 20), Consistency (max 15), and Verification status (max 10). Scores above 80 are rated "Elite".
Account Classification
674.8K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@codewith_random
3.4M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@womensbest
The Influence Index reflects an account's overall impact potential on a scale of 1-100, combining audience size with engagement quality and content activity.
Engagement Quality
@codewith_random
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@womensbest
0.00%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@codewith_random
0.0033
Very influential
@womensbest
1:39.7K
Very influential
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@codewith_random
0.02
Low@womensbest
0.00
LowContent Density measures total posts per 1,000 followers. Higher values indicate more prolific content creation relative to audience size. Celebrity accounts typically show low density due to massive follower counts.
Expert Verdict & Conclusion
Overall Analysis:
After analyzing all available metrics across 5 categories, @codewith_random emerges as the narrow leader in this comparison with 2 metric wins compared to @womensbest's 1.
@codewith_random
@codewith_random excels in: Engagement Rate, Avg Comments.
With an engagement rate of 0.05% (benchmark for this size: 0.5-1%), this profile demonstrates below-average audience interaction.
@womensbest
@womensbest excels in: Followers.
Conclusion
This comparison highlights that Instagram success is multifaceted. While @womensbest has the larger audience (3.4M followers), @codewith_random generates deeper engagement per post (0.05%). Both accounts represent significant influence within their space on Instagram.
Other Comparisons You Might Like
Account comparisons in the same category as @codewith_random
FAQ About @codewith_random vs @womensbest
Detailed answers about this specific comparison and metrics
Still have questions?
Contact us